From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BB6C10F11 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 18:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9712820835 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 18:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="O1/F2Qpu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9712820835 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44q8jX4cWZzDqHn for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:58:40 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=permerror (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2001:8b0:10b:1236::1; helo=casper.infradead.org; envelope-from=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="O1/F2Qpu"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44q7hb3vr0zDqWx for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:12:47 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ojgIGtqBjKZ94rG62AN3WAggUWCZ+hJ6m5woSpGnwUc=; b=O1/F2Qpu51GO8rXz1zY6kYk99L XrZlPd3IlyXTDjPoqKWGkQ5L9ocnA+I/P9bunB/fSk9vhEPYRAZEeNbp8uderR2zg3eMU4Um449UQ JDiIDpo4Y/nvTg9W5eMOQW4SVXC4xvq+GLXJzJzNtdosM6b0r2bRoOiynVZDK9eu2ZpBQyEI2tzzn 2+Hq0uDmIVrzTNK1UXukkg/kMtNzFd2MEIvgNbLYOdakf1WdML/JmeoL6fYbGbSyagrhuUE2/qLwk 2nZ2nuZANyvKzCUoyn/QXq9V9RbcfqO/Yq09GKoeR4BYNCqOMXCJke1on90Pix4qUKL0knXOa1JYy iBqFTp0w==; Received: from 177.17.136.231.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br ([177.17.136.231] helo=coco.lan) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hJMNt-000219-Pf; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 18:12:42 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 15:12:36 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Changbin Du Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 20/23] Documentation: ACPI: move cppc_sysfs.txt to admin-guide/acpi and convert to reST Message-ID: <20190424151236.776d9678@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190424175306.25880-21-changbin.du@gmail.com> References: <20190424175306.25880-1-changbin.du@gmail.com> <20190424175306.25880-21-changbin.du@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Em Thu, 25 Apr 2019 01:53:03 +0800 Changbin Du escreveu: > This converts the plain text documentation to reStructuredText format and > add it to Sphinx TOC tree. No essential content change. > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du > --- > .../acpi/cppc_sysfs.rst} | 71 ++++++++++--------- > Documentation/admin-guide/acpi/index.rst | 1 + > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > rename Documentation/{acpi/cppc_sysfs.txt => admin-guide/acpi/cppc_sysfs.rst} (51%) > > diff --git a/Documentation/acpi/cppc_sysfs.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/acpi/cppc_sysfs.rst > similarity index 51% > rename from Documentation/acpi/cppc_sysfs.txt > rename to Documentation/admin-guide/acpi/cppc_sysfs.rst > index f20fb445135d..a4b99afbe331 100644 > --- a/Documentation/acpi/cppc_sysfs.txt > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/acpi/cppc_sysfs.rst > @@ -1,5 +1,11 @@ > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > - Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) > +================================================== > +Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) > +================================================== > + > +CPPC > +==== > > CPPC defined in the ACPI spec describes a mechanism for the OS to manage the > performance of a logical processor on a contigious and abstract performance > @@ -10,31 +16,28 @@ For more details on CPPC please refer to the ACPI specification at: > > http://uefi.org/specifications > > -Some of the CPPC registers are exposed via sysfs under: > - > -/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/acpi_cppc/ > - > -for each cpu X Yeah, there it is: you're removing those two lines. > +Some of the CPPC registers are exposed via sysfs under:: > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > + /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/acpi_cppc/ As per my reply to v4. Thanks, Mauro