From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08D2C43219 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 19:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCC2F206BB for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 19:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="AHZqjeYB" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DCC2F206BB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44wjdx4WP9zDqc1 for ; Sat, 4 May 2019 05:59:49 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::443; helo=mail-pf1-x443.google.com; envelope-from=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="AHZqjeYB"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44wjcM2kJmzDqY3 for ; Sat, 4 May 2019 05:58:26 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id e24so3374074pfi.12 for ; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:58:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WB6WukALIt5LPSFOLetrqCfdn6458xhXun4VAeBfku8=; b=AHZqjeYBooF34dvlJEEYqeS5a/OwB/N3wk8oRUX3xMNSZkJpPj2xUUUhnfeja/ANyO tLcv8IyusQA50EJQjTWkpWqIyRR/dEIwxDFO38PsT9Yr/CGqyAmXM0zi/CYIKU/Tpdzs R4tXGXyS977mH72o1FZgcd3NrHQ4BhL4DfLfyNDG3TvWlrO7QMvI2+13BEABMzrV9zd3 Wu4t6R2/qCSX4OIx24AO7VADifBn7OP2NwFxU7vTCga6cc0iM6EblGTAsERoUhKpvbSm 0soVKjoHaKXoMJZbuEM6ie18l9NrzilF1wzJWAIFdQoBCxxpogrzCe6g3QHS4vuShJz1 UlOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WB6WukALIt5LPSFOLetrqCfdn6458xhXun4VAeBfku8=; b=DKK+zhji2bOkuvXJIcqNFV93OmiJECv078E/6lNlcPf45DsWwvdgxcQNjznM2Je4nb d2+FyjMaU7ZWy0MidbsP92nXlwDV0Z4xGOwuoRLxJzuMd0bQdhCggjp+OBcdAI/03N1c N8BZa3cS1taNMDYWsb2jy/WNqFY+hb3TEA8jjgSznG9ovxJHlksXqlvt6oTr0WE54mh+ fux4WR95H8Aa948lOCzjztCvlTYASRUAuXkkGsT4hzn4mERhYxoTI0KotxyM/MGdnDuX zddStx5mzuhccYBygb5gnWLcdjdPyzrr4IpTFaAfJHTGAmREQji+OPUvaIypan9X3J29 iCrg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWCKsXJhlw0TpDFI15vLKvq1BBxuBuYSzbd1FpFdXNo2JNMlCVV LBkU5p83Km7neHNqUyNEggc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy7TK+EVMdOx5DGkjrJ0eA7+vRZ/pb3vRx0DHFz2qS0ZuFK5ZP5l67SdIG88fBWSJiRE/CyAg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:d347:: with SMTP id u7mr13073160pgi.254.1556913503804; Fri, 03 May 2019 12:58:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com (thunderhill.nvidia.com. [216.228.112.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i15sm4868020pfr.8.2019.05.03.12.58.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 May 2019 12:58:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 12:56:49 -0700 From: Nicolin Chen To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH V4] ASoC: fsl_esai: Add pm runtime function Message-ID: <20190503195648.GA30289@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com> References: <20190502023945.GA19532@sirena.org.uk> <20190503042731.GX14916@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190503042731.GX14916@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "timur@kernel.org" , "Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com" , "festevam@gmail.com" , "S.j. Wang" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hi Mark, On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 01:27:31PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 09:13:58AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote: > > > I am checking, but I don't know why this patch failed in your side. I > > Tried to apply this patch on for-5.1, for 5.2, for-linus and for-next, all are > > Successful. The git is git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git. > > > I can't reproduce your problem. Is there any my operation wrong? > > The error message I got was: > > Applying: ASoC: fsl_esai: Add pm runtime function > error: patch failed: sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c:9 > error: sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c: patch does not apply > Patch failed at 0001 ASoC: fsl_esai: Add pm runtime function > > which is the header addition. I can't spot any obvious issues visually > looking at the patch, only thing I can think is some kind of whitespace > damage somewhere. I downloaded this v4 from patchwork and resubmitted a v5 for a test. Would you please try to apply that one? If my v5 works vs. having merge conflict at v4, maybe something wrong with Git version of Shengjiu's? I compared my v5 and his v4 using vimdiff, there is no much difference of whitespace. Thanks Nicolin