From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 09:48:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190506074824.GA40476@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25dfde77-fdad-0b99-75ec-4ba480058970@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
* Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> I _am_ bending the C rules a bit with the "extern some_var; asm
> volatile(".section some_section\nsome_var: blabla");". I should
> probably ask on the gcc list whether this way of defining a local
> symbol in inline assembly and referring to it from C is supposed to
> work, or it just happens to work by chance.
Doing that would be rather useful I think.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-06 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-09 21:25 [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 07/10] dynamic_debug: add asm-generic implementation for DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-09 21:25 ` [PATCH 10/10] powerpc: select DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS for PPC64 Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-23 15:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-04-23 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2019-04-24 6:46 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06 6:48 ` [PATCH 00/10] implement DYNAMIC_DEBUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06 7:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-06 7:34 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-05-06 7:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-05-06 14:48 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190506074824.GA40476@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).