From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFD0C004C9 for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F20E20675 for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:43:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1F20E20675 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44z7lj0z7PzDqNp for ; Wed, 8 May 2019 04:43:13 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44z7fG2tnWzDq5b for ; Wed, 8 May 2019 04:38:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABD9B308FEE2; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t460s.redhat.com (ovpn-116-95.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.95]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B871EF; Tue, 7 May 2019 18:38:23 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] s390x/mm: Implement arch_remove_memory() Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 20:37:58 +0200 Message-Id: <20190507183804.5512-3-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190507183804.5512-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20190507183804.5512-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.49]); Tue, 07 May 2019 18:38:28 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Oscar Salvador , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Vasily Gorbik , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , Heiko Carstens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport , Martin Schwidefsky , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Dan Williams Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Will come in handy when wanting to handle errors after arch_add_memory(). Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Vasily Gorbik Cc: Oscar Salvador Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- arch/s390/mm/init.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c index 31b1071315d7..1e0cbae69f12 100644 --- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c @@ -237,12 +237,13 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, void arch_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, struct vmem_altmap *altmap) { - /* - * There is no hardware or firmware interface which could trigger a - * hot memory remove on s390. So there is nothing that needs to be - * implemented. - */ - BUG(); + unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT; + unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT; + struct zone *zone; + + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn)); + __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages, altmap); + vmem_remove_mapping(start, size); } #endif #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */ -- 2.20.1