From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116FDC04AAC for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 14:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86887206BA for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 14:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=brauner.io header.i=@brauner.io header.b="DauQZ4rg" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 86887206BA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=brauner.io Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45722w20F2zDqG8 for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 00:53:44 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=brauner.io (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::342; helo=mail-wm1-x342.google.com; envelope-from=christian@brauner.io; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=brauner.io Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=brauner.io header.i=@brauner.io header.b="DauQZ4rg"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com (mail-wm1-x342.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::342]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4571wx6VQGzDqKs for ; Tue, 21 May 2019 00:48:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id 15so9301305wmg.5 for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 07:48:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brauner.io; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=N7wB0bhMnAowtyDk7cjOKmaZEhZ6/2E0ef5LypbT5pM=; b=DauQZ4rgS8TTJobEVuVF04IQ8OrrQsWx/7I3dVssObK0ub6Wu5l3OX+dW7klHHK0qm VTzmbSB41r23etZTCBjrd8m+r36Fu5u/KMx97MMxNxqrc49IzLJgxrXuPKJbtCw731N2 2I/Or4zAH6edPPIHVOmx0J8f7ho+EcxpE4+E0tEGBsS3gW21YphO/NArsQ/NQg3lEiKL oDh24dU1R+R5HUs2yW4HElupA/gn8GbEgZeLHFFkjPe+prcmClURRdntkwM4xCV3R301 oyEP0r/asVzA0N6Yse3cdeLbDHxEh1gQMX/6fsFKeqmxjgm0wnRNCfyORqg0I7sZtKZ1 ZpMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=N7wB0bhMnAowtyDk7cjOKmaZEhZ6/2E0ef5LypbT5pM=; b=Bb1F7zdM8FCAbLGcdixxqaNzU1xNO1EwWNkqFR12dP75TAkIqjMfj4WnYZL/FBNFW0 v771yG5HVavfTWGlEU53yh/B8FkjrYVRxkJXb0bbSbddtb0hBgllaGBu6wOugWPXsuxT F7Bqnlxxfk/ZzAB4kwlwoaSi7HblbrOS6nl6JG9uEo/8Y3qR1ft/ObuDuuWNSGEqISTo 2OMrq634tPUg85s7t9aQ6ZodXi35F47m7SL1y9bjGRXtD+DPqSLkXbLG/ObhhdiLZ5DP FP14dLVgJ218Su++QynwpK7E6dGEFx+Y1ZOdAq9K2h0qUNszHo02whZnudJIuf8w9sbn MJ4w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXru4Fi6cU1MoAj5D/ondw+1gsyQrZhx6tfmbeeyjXjcDGNZwP5 WA7JjngprCdRjYEwlMY8bODk5w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzgUfAfX/fOEqJpAu0H05y9iE6v85VXR9NGZP9lcwztHn9oG8QSJSLuvfJRMuYHnyshwQXXCQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6a0e:: with SMTP id f14mr17177633wmc.69.1558363705786; Mon, 20 May 2019 07:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brauner.io ([212.91.227.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z1sm3308970wrl.91.2019.05.20.07.48.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 May 2019 07:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 16:48:23 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pid: add pidfd_open() Message-ID: <20190520144822.xfaifawi65jus6ng@brauner.io> References: <20190520134605.29116-1-christian@brauner.io> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux-sh list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Howells , Joel Fernandes , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , sparclinux , Linux API , "Reshetova, Elena" , linux-arch , linux-s390 , Daniel Colascione , Android Kernel Team , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Kees Cook , Jann Horn , linux-m68k , Al Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Oleg Nesterov , Thomas Gleixner , Suren Baghdasaryan , Linux ARM , Parisc List , cyphar@cyphar.com, Linus Torvalds , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , "Eric W . Biederman" , alpha , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:37:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:46 PM Christian Brauner wrote: > > > > In line with Arnd's recent changes to consolidate syscall numbers across > > architectures, I have added the pidfd_open() syscall to all architectures > > at the same time. > > Thanks! I've checked that the ones you have added are all > done correctly. However, double-checking that you got all of them, > I noticed that you missed mips-o32 and mips-n64. With those added: > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Perfect, will plumb mips-o32 and mips-n64 and resend once more with your ack added. Sidenote: You plan on merging the common syscall tables or will there be a script to do this work per-arch in the future?