From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D34C072A4 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44BFA20851 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:24:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 44BFA20851 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4582dv3LxmzDqDW for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 16:24:03 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4582Zg56YnzDq7h for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 16:21:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4M6JdsJ055678 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 02:21:13 -0400 Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2smwp466wv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 02:21:13 -0400 Received: from localhost by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:21:11 +0100 Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.23) by e17.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.204) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 22 May 2019 07:21:09 +0100 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4M6L80422085798 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:08 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044AC11206D; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C6B112062; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skywalker.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.124.31.87]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 May 2019 06:21:06 +0000 (GMT) From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: dan.j.williams@intel.com Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/nvdimm: Add page size and struct page size to pfn superblock Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 11:50:56 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190522062057.26581-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190522062057.26581-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19052206-0040-0000-0000-000004F2D316 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011141; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000286; SDB=6.01206843; UDB=6.00633755; IPR=6.00987819; MB=3.00026997; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-05-22 06:21:10 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19052206-0041-0000-0000-000008FEE6E7 Message-Id: <20190522062057.26581-2-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-05-22_03:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905220046 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This is needed so that we don't wrongly initialize a namespace which doesn't have enough space reserved for holding struct pages with the current kernel. We also increment PFN_MIN_VERSION to make sure that older kernel won't initialize namespace created with newer kernel. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h | 9 ++++++--- drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h index 1b10ae5773b6..ba11738ca8a2 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn.h @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ * kernel should fail to initialize that namespace. */ -#define PFN_MIN_VERSION 0 +#define PFN_MIN_VERSION 1 struct nd_pfn_sb { u8 signature[PFN_SIG_LEN]; @@ -42,8 +42,11 @@ struct nd_pfn_sb { __le32 end_trunc; /* minor-version-2 record the base alignment of the mapping */ __le32 align; - __le16 min_verison; - u8 padding[3998]; + __le16 min_version; + /* minor-version-3 record the page size and struct page size */ + __le16 page_struct_size; + __le32 page_size; + u8 padding[3992]; __le64 checksum; }; diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c index 3250de70a7b3..94918a4e6e73 100644 --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c @@ -462,6 +462,15 @@ int nd_pfn_validate(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, const char *sig) if (__le16_to_cpu(pfn_sb->version_minor) < 2) pfn_sb->align = 0; + if (__le16_to_cpu(pfn_sb->version_minor) < 3) { + /* + * For a large part we use PAGE_SIZE. But we + * do have some accounting code using SZ_4K. + */ + pfn_sb->page_struct_size = cpu_to_le16(64); + pfn_sb->page_size = cpu_to_le32(SZ_4K); + } + switch (le32_to_cpu(pfn_sb->mode)) { case PFN_MODE_RAM: case PFN_MODE_PMEM: @@ -477,6 +486,12 @@ int nd_pfn_validate(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, const char *sig) align = 1UL << ilog2(offset); mode = le32_to_cpu(pfn_sb->mode); + if (le32_to_cpu(pfn_sb->page_size) != PAGE_SIZE) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + if (le16_to_cpu(pfn_sb->page_struct_size) != sizeof(struct page)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + if (!nd_pfn->uuid) { /* * When probing a namepace via nd_pfn_probe() the uuid @@ -771,11 +786,13 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn) memcpy(pfn_sb->uuid, nd_pfn->uuid, 16); memcpy(pfn_sb->parent_uuid, nd_dev_to_uuid(&ndns->dev), 16); pfn_sb->version_major = cpu_to_le16(1); - pfn_sb->version_minor = cpu_to_le16(2); + pfn_sb->version_minor = cpu_to_le16(3); pfn_sb->min_version = cpu_to_le16(PFN_MIN_VERSION); pfn_sb->start_pad = cpu_to_le32(start_pad); pfn_sb->end_trunc = cpu_to_le32(end_trunc); pfn_sb->align = cpu_to_le32(nd_pfn->align); + pfn_sb->page_struct_size = cpu_to_le16(sizeof(struct page)); + pfn_sb->page_size = cpu_to_le32(PAGE_SIZE); checksum = nd_sb_checksum((struct nd_gen_sb *) pfn_sb); pfn_sb->checksum = cpu_to_le64(checksum); -- 2.21.0