From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B13C28CC5 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 21:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A1120652 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 21:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="uI2GOFin" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 80A1120652 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45K1wB2RsgzDqSF for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 07:22:34 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::541; helo=mail-ed1-x541.google.com; envelope-from=richard.weiyang@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="uI2GOFin"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-ed1-x541.google.com (mail-ed1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::541]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45K1td1JY3zDqYL for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 07:21:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ed1-x541.google.com with SMTP id r18so7747085edo.7 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:21:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DbESKGjaSdEzS+8K4ZZpYJHwCVMJbIIgpVyCBcGmoDA=; b=uI2GOFinAV8sZvL+69rPUYkiOvfq/P6RaIvMP/TCLE7Eigu+OsAMxrlQ7M56dpfeaB KXnPuGlaLKfjVW4OK022oY9x2O84uuKCnTuTJ2Hy/rU4g60rDzrdLH9+Tx5dD+CSiY7P MZd6Gt4WuEMmALvkc+6OxkvqFlyqE8pj0B+RKWqsERmaO6rCiyUFNdAQJaK+bn+j6ZDo 3+Ozb7/fHxX66bj8rSxIxrArPzuRzb+SpAu32sfxsWnMui2GD+nbp3sZ5ByAMfIb0inB TyCDQNWvPlw0yG17KhNWZpYS35pRM3rqQaLlQ7Rzw4ggssD4+ZfqKxNNHceKsI3nMqCT +Ubw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DbESKGjaSdEzS+8K4ZZpYJHwCVMJbIIgpVyCBcGmoDA=; b=gd2YBpONziAlP57Fw/g7Yq22WiOuJ6JVAl9QOMexnttw5P2Bes8PwiZB91Qro92L7N WwqDKXsarWWrR4A83U7a/xB6Zl0wbKBnETC82WOpbNja5ubjWf0qTMtQuHsUpBtWZdmY 0kJDpWeswrp8v1IDmPVXCCG1YH4aQ1RrFEweN7u7VaNx0PFoVFCAaDk4m2tuOFXTgffK wnZ3W+1kRpbSNoCY1sDrOCQUaCmy3BW8jHdAbVIYU8TvmUu8OvD/yFLrPB+uOS+dVgNo lwSdM9gqjx1xU2Nj2Suz4zDJqbo5vDivN7BnFOb5HPhslVdv9I0l9wiqx/E5IRSpfl/m LnGw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV74EuTfHRKPGYWwSP24IGxWM0HvuScmiVGe43hFbZey/8Wxwgs tXB2VEsGpsgBl40mpVod6tg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyuNRjvHNzTb2gEE1mIj1supSxm4qc3GPA7ju0Tg73FF069vkjl4Ke6VX7sPJnRrK6BAE1EDw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:b523:: with SMTP id y32mr38680719edd.209.1559769668613; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([185.92.221.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x19sm3180078edq.9.2019.06.05.14.21.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Jun 2019 14:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 21:21:06 +0000 From: Wei Yang To: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() never fail Message-ID: <20190605212106.6folqx2zawbvzzmm@master> References: <20190527111152.16324-1-david@redhat.com> <20190527111152.16324-11-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190527111152.16324-11-david@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Wei Yang Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wei Yang , linux-mm@kvack.org, "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Cameron , Alex Deucher , Igor Mammedov , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chris Wilson , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Oscar Salvador Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:11:51PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >We really don't want anything during memory hotunplug to fail. >We always pass a valid memory block device, that check can go. Avoid >allocating memory and eventually failing. As we are always called under >lock, we can use a static piece of memory. This avoids having to put >the structure onto the stack, having to guess about the stack size >of callers. > >Patch inspired by a patch from Oscar Salvador. > >In the future, there might be no need to iterate over nodes at all. >mem->nid should tell us exactly what to remove. Memory block devices >with mixed nodes (added during boot) should properly fenced off and never >removed. > >Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman >Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >Cc: Alex Deucher >Cc: "David S. Miller" >Cc: Mark Brown >Cc: Chris Wilson >Cc: David Hildenbrand >Cc: Oscar Salvador >Cc: Andrew Morton >Cc: Jonathan Cameron >Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Wei Yang >--- > drivers/base/node.c | 18 +++++------------- > include/linux/node.h | 5 ++--- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c >index 04fdfa99b8bc..9be88fd05147 100644 >--- a/drivers/base/node.c >+++ b/drivers/base/node.c >@@ -803,20 +803,14 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, void *arg) > > /* > * Unregister memory block device under all nodes that it spans. >+ * Has to be called with mem_sysfs_mutex held (due to unlinked_nodes). > */ >-int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) >+void unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) > { >- NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL); > unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn; >+ static nodemask_t unlinked_nodes; > >- if (!mem_blk) { >- NODEMASK_FREE(unlinked_nodes); >- return -EFAULT; >- } >- if (!unlinked_nodes) >- return -ENOMEM; >- nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes); >- >+ nodes_clear(unlinked_nodes); > sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr); > sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr); > for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) { >@@ -827,15 +821,13 @@ int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) > continue; > if (!node_online(nid)) > continue; >- if (node_test_and_set(nid, *unlinked_nodes)) >+ if (node_test_and_set(nid, unlinked_nodes)) > continue; > sysfs_remove_link(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj, > kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj)); > sysfs_remove_link(&mem_blk->dev.kobj, > kobject_name(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj)); > } >- NODEMASK_FREE(unlinked_nodes); >- return 0; > } > > int link_mem_sections(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) >diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h >index 02a29e71b175..548c226966a2 100644 >--- a/include/linux/node.h >+++ b/include/linux/node.h >@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ extern int register_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); > extern int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); > extern int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > void *arg); >-extern int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk); >+extern void unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk); > > extern int register_memory_node_under_compute_node(unsigned int mem_nid, > unsigned int cpu_nid, >@@ -175,9 +175,8 @@ static inline int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > { > return 0; > } >-static inline int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) >+static inline void unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) > { >- return 0; > } > > static inline void register_hugetlbfs_with_node(node_registration_func_t reg, >-- >2.20.1 -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me