From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EB2C76191 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 08:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A3412173E for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 08:44:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9A3412173E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45q73k5fW0zDqLG for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:44:34 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45q7196W7szDqFS for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 18:42:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A8FCC68B05; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:42:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:42:13 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active() Message-ID: <20190718084213.GA24562@lst.de> References: <20190718032858.28744-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> <20190718032858.28744-3-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190718032858.28744-3-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Mike Anderson , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Robin Murphy , x86@kernel.org, Ram Pai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan , Halil Pasic , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Lendacky , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:28:54AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > sme_active() is an x86-specific function so it's better not to call it from > generic code. > > There's no need to mention which memory encryption feature is active, so > just use a more generic message. Besides, other architectures will have > different names for similar technology. > > Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig