From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46703C3A589 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85C442064A for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="refM5sSM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 85C442064A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roeck-us.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468ZM069R1zDqrW for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 04:13:16 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::541; helo=mail-pg1-x541.google.com; envelope-from=groeck7@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roeck-us.net Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="refM5sSM"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com (mail-pg1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 468ZHX3T2szDr8C for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 04:10:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id e11so1631692pga.5 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:10:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YGZciRmFKywos7phtHka3BMLOjJ5GD0teHhlJqhmVkk=; b=refM5sSMD7XaWN2cBYtXuBqQL++UFaQwWAlfDTzJPByqFlruWjmG6Yh089jW7TdpbD NrxNm0s2FZstcIYgXU/1OVsLWK+FGl/oYQP7+rTaMZkVBgGR23anbQo8oXgra9wTo9FE j2SPBqMOEPNcKZuxqfPe/Pg1VNQm0EO34QutZQTrQlKL2cYjCOVrLe8Oxo+zJZteOQlu B8hMLNBQEAo1UHIr3ABYn9iPuYxpRN+b0Z+J5xpbw/J0aCqSamjWusXlwPIWC+3YINI7 nT835bJJdCLvSjcjCqTDzc+ntlidStA5Dl6+CgzdON8g1MYQ6qhhFDs0HvmQv88M+BJb dCaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YGZciRmFKywos7phtHka3BMLOjJ5GD0teHhlJqhmVkk=; b=WYHeENhyNubB/IM/FQ/o5lzyhUJvqN8FwdnqjiqJHLNF5NliNHQbT3TY7htLxeLz25 ccRkBu5Uaf2w9k9enGDgw4FHJM4QcK+/BTnM2CC3lam/oS7ArL8Qg7pO+WK5Z86uLHEN EAcEIpyonknUC8KtZfLnb4RFPAWZbI4K5zmAIygZf4aim1ba2xlLJPsUIVh3QdEsD2xX 65XfCEdEewxik4kr6EcflSYGI1cF3r+faT7o2PbqKbQbvLWaKuOe35WXEI0fYmDZ9W6O wZABcabds2rQPmFBxXWrOrcBQDANJE0emfG2mTFGDVQGtDBV3Y+Z2K90EZPJSfSn3RAK dAHA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWc0Op5fDEc7Kh3o//mMh4sLima1MzYOVyReMoDqKCs6X1jRQno R+U5n6TUWDkktzsq8qoitVw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxIDdyy6by/HwcLogs24nzI99cv+AM8Nkc5yJYlPuae0cwXsF1pvVTorAHFvjBOwQbrOwQiZw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:38d7:: with SMTP id f206mr6797850pfa.102.1565892612133; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n98sm1927437pjc.26.2019.08.15.11.10.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:10:10 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/18] compat_ioctl: move WDIOC handling into wdt drivers Message-ID: <20190815181010.GA28580@roeck-us.net> References: <20190814204259.120942-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190814205245.121691-1-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190814205245.121691-1-arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Belloni , Jean Delvare , Anatolij Gustschin , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Ferre , Ludovic Desroches , Florian Fainelli , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Wim Van Sebroeck , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:49:18PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > All watchdog drivers implement the same set of ioctl commands, and > fortunately all of them are compatible between 32-bit and 64-bit > architectures. > > Modern drivers always go through drivers/watchdog/wdt.c as an abstraction > layer, but older ones implement their own file_operations on a character > device for this. > > Move the handling from fs/compat_ioctl.c into the individual drivers. > > Note that most of the legacy drivers will never be used on 64-bit > hardware, because they are for an old 32-bit SoC implementation, but > doing them all at once is safer than trying to guess which ones do > or do not need the compat_ioctl handling. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck This patch doesn't seem to have a useful base (or at least git says so). It does not apply to mainline nor to my own watchdog-next branch. I assume you plan to apply the entire series together. Please not that there will be conflicts against watchdog-next when you do so. Guenter