From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F40C3A59F for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 06:55:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F0982343A for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 06:55:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5F0982343A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=davemloft.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46L6Yq311zzDr8N for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 16:55:43 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=davemloft.net (client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:9; helo=shards.monkeyblade.net; envelope-from=davem@davemloft.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=davemloft.net Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net (shards.monkeyblade.net [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46L6Wg3Wc5zDqlw for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 16:53:48 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::d71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF53B15520975; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 23:53:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 23:53:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20190830.235337.570776316111294728.davem@davemloft.net> To: linyunsheng@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] sparc64: numa: check the node id consistently for sparc64 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1567231103-13237-8-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> References: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <1567231103-13237-8-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 23:53:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org, cai@lca.pw, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, x86@kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jhogan@kernel.org, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mattst88@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rth@twiddle.net, axboe@kernel.dk, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, tbogendoerfer@suse.de, paul.burton@mips.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, akpm@linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Yunsheng Lin Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:58:21 +0800 > According to Section 6.2.14 from ACPI spec 6.3 [1], the setting > of proximity domain is optional, as below: What in the world does the ACPI spec have to do with sparc64 NUMA node ID checking?