linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: sbobroff@linux.ibm.com, Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Clean up EEH PEs after recovery finishes
Date: Tue,  3 Sep 2019 20:15:52 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903101605.2890-2-oohall@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903101605.2890-1-oohall@gmail.com>

When the last device in an eeh_pe is removed the eeh_pe structure itself
(and any empty parents) are freed since they are no longer needed. This
results in a crash when a hotplug driver is involved since the following
may occur:

1. Device is suprise removed.
2. Driver performs an MMIO, which fails and queues and eeh_event.
3. Hotplug driver receives a hotplug interrupt and removes any
   pci_devs that were under the slot.
4. pci_dev is torn down and the eeh_pe is freed.
5. The EEH event handler thread processes the eeh_event and crashes
   since the eeh_pe pointer in the eeh_event structure is no
   longer valid.

Crashing is generally considered poor form. Instead of doing that use
the fact PEs are marked as EEH_PE_INVALID to keep them around until the
end of the recovery cycle, at which point we can safely prune any empty
PEs.

Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
---
Sam Bobroff is working on implementing proper refcounting for EEH PEs,
but that's not going to be ready for a while and this is less broken
than what we have now.
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_event.c  |  8 +++++++
 arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c     | 23 +++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
index a31cd32c4ce9..75266156943f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
@@ -734,6 +734,33 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(struct eeh_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus,
  */
 #define MAX_WAIT_FOR_RECOVERY 300
 
+
+/* Walks the PE tree after processing an event to remove any stale PEs.
+ *
+ * NB: This needs to be recursive to ensure the leaf PEs get removed
+ * before their parents do. Although this is possible to do recursively
+ * we don't since this is easier to read and we need to garantee
+ * the leaf nodes will be handled first.
+ */
+static void eeh_pe_cleanup(struct eeh_pe *pe)
+{
+	struct eeh_pe *child_pe, *tmp;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(child_pe, tmp, &pe->child_list, child)
+		eeh_pe_cleanup(child_pe);
+
+	if (pe->state & EEH_PE_KEEP)
+		return;
+
+	if (!(pe->state & EEH_PE_INVALID))
+		return;
+
+	if (list_empty(&pe->edevs) && list_empty(&pe->child_list)) {
+		list_del(&pe->child);
+		kfree(pe);
+	}
+}
+
 /**
  * eeh_handle_normal_event - Handle EEH events on a specific PE
  * @pe: EEH PE - which should not be used after we return, as it may
@@ -772,8 +799,6 @@ void eeh_handle_normal_event(struct eeh_pe *pe)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	eeh_pe_state_mark(pe, EEH_PE_RECOVERING);
-
 	eeh_pe_update_time_stamp(pe);
 	pe->freeze_count++;
 	if (pe->freeze_count > eeh_max_freezes) {
@@ -963,6 +988,12 @@ void eeh_handle_normal_event(struct eeh_pe *pe)
 			return;
 		}
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Clean up any PEs without devices. While marked as EEH_PE_RECOVERYING
+	 * we don't want to modify the PE tree structure so we do it here.
+	 */
+	eeh_pe_cleanup(pe);
 	eeh_pe_state_clear(pe, EEH_PE_RECOVERING, true);
 }
 
@@ -1035,6 +1066,7 @@ void eeh_handle_special_event(void)
 		 */
 		if (rc == EEH_NEXT_ERR_FROZEN_PE ||
 		    rc == EEH_NEXT_ERR_FENCED_PHB) {
+			eeh_pe_state_mark(pe, EEH_PE_RECOVERING);
 			eeh_handle_normal_event(pe);
 		} else {
 			pci_lock_rescan_remove();
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_event.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_event.c
index 64cfbe41174b..e36653e5f76b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_event.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_event.c
@@ -121,6 +121,14 @@ int __eeh_send_failure_event(struct eeh_pe *pe)
 	}
 	event->pe = pe;
 
+	/*
+	 * Mark the PE as recovering before inserting it in the queue.
+	 * This prevents the PE from being free()ed by a hotplug driver
+	 * while the PE is sitting in the event queue.
+	 */
+	if (pe)
+		eeh_pe_state_mark(pe, EEH_PE_RECOVERING);
+
 	/* We may or may not be called in an interrupt context */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&eeh_eventlist_lock, flags);
 	list_add(&event->list, &eeh_eventlist);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
index 1a6254bcf056..177852e39a25 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
@@ -470,6 +470,7 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 int eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 {
 	struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent, *child;
+	bool keep, recover;
 	int cnt;
 
 	pe = eeh_dev_to_pe(edev);
@@ -490,10 +491,21 @@ int eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 	 */
 	while (1) {
 		parent = pe->parent;
+
+		/* PHB PEs should never be removed */
 		if (pe->type & EEH_PE_PHB)
 			break;
 
-		if (!(pe->state & EEH_PE_KEEP)) {
+		/*
+		 * XXX: KEEP is set while resetting a PE. I don't think it's
+		 * ever set without RECOVERING also being set. I could
+		 * be wrong though so catch that with a WARN.
+		 */
+		keep = !!(pe->state & EEH_PE_KEEP);
+		recover = !!(pe->state & EEH_PE_RECOVERING);
+		WARN_ON(keep && !recover);
+
+		if (!keep && !recover) {
 			if (list_empty(&pe->edevs) &&
 			    list_empty(&pe->child_list)) {
 				list_del(&pe->child);
@@ -502,6 +514,15 @@ int eeh_rmv_from_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 				break;
 			}
 		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Mark the PE as invalid. At the end of the recovery
+			 * process any invalid PEs will be garbage collected.
+			 *
+			 * We need to delay the free()ing of them since we can
+			 * remove edev's while traversing the PE tree which
+			 * might trigger the removal of a PE and we can't
+			 * deal with that (yet).
+			 */
 			if (list_empty(&pe->edevs)) {
 				cnt = 0;
 				list_for_each_entry(child, &pe->child_list, child) {
-- 
2.21.0


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-03 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-03 10:15 EEH + hotplug fixes Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-03 10:15 ` Oliver O'Halloran [this message]
2019-09-17  0:43   ` [PATCH 01/14] powerpc/eeh: Clean up EEH PEs after recovery finishes Sam Bobroff
2019-09-19 10:25   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-03 10:15 ` [PATCH 02/14] powerpc/eeh: Fix race when freeing PDNs Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-17  0:50   ` Sam Bobroff
2019-09-03 10:15 ` [PATCH 03/14] powerpc/eeh: Make permanently failed devices non-actionable Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-17  0:51   ` Sam Bobroff
2019-09-03 10:15 ` [PATCH 04/14] powerpc/eeh: Check slot presence state in eeh_handle_normal_event() Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-17  1:00   ` Sam Bobroff
2019-09-17  4:20     ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-03 10:15 ` [PATCH 05/14] powerpc/eeh: Defer printing stack trace Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-17  1:04   ` Sam Bobroff
2019-09-17  1:45     ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-17  3:35       ` Sam Bobroff
2019-09-17  3:38         ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-03 10:15 ` [PATCH 06/14] powerpc/eeh: Remove stale CAPI comment Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-03 14:09   ` Andrew Donnellan
2019-09-17  1:04   ` Sam Bobroff
2019-09-03 10:15 ` [PATCH 07/14] powernv/eeh: Use generic code to handle hot resets Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-17  1:15   ` Sam Bobroff
2019-09-17  7:30     ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-03 10:15 ` [PATCH 08/14] pci-hotplug/pnv_php: Add a reset_slot() callback Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-03 10:16 ` [PATCH 09/14] pci-hotplug/pnv_php: Add support for IODA3 Power9 PHBs Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-03 10:16 ` [PATCH 10/14] pci-hotplug/pnv_php: Add attention indicator support Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-03 10:16 ` [PATCH 11/14] powerpc/eeh: Set attention indicator while recovering Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-17  1:23   ` Sam Bobroff
2019-09-03 10:16 ` [PATCH 12/14] powerpc/eeh: Add debugfs interface to run an EEH check Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-17  3:15   ` Sam Bobroff
2019-09-17  3:36     ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-17  4:23       ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-03 10:16 ` [PATCH 13/14] powerpc/eeh: Add a eeh_dev_break debugfs interface Oliver O'Halloran
2019-09-17  3:19   ` Sam Bobroff
2019-09-03 10:16 ` [PATCH 14/14] selftests/powerpc: Add basic EEH selftest Oliver O'Halloran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190903101605.2890-2-oohall@gmail.com \
    --to=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sbobroff@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).