From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFFEC4CEC6 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3D220830 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:49:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DF3D220830 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46WKjD1H12zF6CQ for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 16:49:04 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=rppt@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46WKgB4FfWzDqT1 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 16:47:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8F6lF44188515 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 02:47:15 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v1djsu3ne-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 02:47:15 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 07:47:07 +0100 Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.194) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Sun, 15 Sep 2019 07:46:55 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8F6krao46858610 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:46:54 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1ADFAE04D; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:46:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EE1AE045; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:46:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.148.8.160]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sun, 15 Sep 2019 06:46:50 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 09:46:48 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Yunsheng Lin Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] mips: numa: make node_to_cpumask_map() NUMA_NO_NODE aware for mips References: <1568283334-178380-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <1568283334-178380-8-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20190915054901.GC11429@linux.ibm.com> <938be3af-ece4-7f5f-34d6-f949ee2a3d32@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <938be3af-ece4-7f5f-34d6-f949ee2a3d32@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19091506-0012-0000-0000-0000034BC3EB X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19091506-0013-0000-0000-0000218636D0 Message-Id: <20190915064647.GD11429@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-15_03:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909150073 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org, cai@lca.pw, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, x86@kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jhogan@kernel.org, mattst88@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mhocko@kernel.org, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rth@twiddle.net, axboe@kernel.dk, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, tbogendoerfer@suse.de, paul.burton@mips.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, akpm@linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, davem@davemloft.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 02:13:51PM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote: > On 2019/9/15 13:49, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 06:15:33PM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote: > >> When passing the return value of dev_to_node() to cpumask_of_node() > >> without checking the node id if the node id is NUMA_NO_NODE, there is > >> global-out-of-bounds detected by KASAN. > >> > >> From the discussion [1], NUMA_NO_NODE really means no node affinity, > >> which also means all cpus should be usable. So the cpumask_of_node() > >> should always return all cpus online when user passes the node id > >> as NUMA_NO_NODE, just like similar semantic that page allocator handles > >> NUMA_NO_NODE. > >> > >> But we cannot really copy the page allocator logic. Simply because the > >> page allocator doesn't enforce the near node affinity. It just picks it > >> up as a preferred node but then it is free to fallback to any other numa > >> node. This is not the case here and node_to_cpumask_map will only restrict > >> to the particular node's cpus which would have really non deterministic > >> behavior depending on where the code is executed. So in fact we really > >> want to return cpu_online_mask for NUMA_NO_NODE. > >> > >> Since this arch was already NUMA_NO_NODE aware, this patch only changes > >> it to return cpu_online_mask and use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of "-1". > >> > >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1125789/ > >> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin > >> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko > >> --- > >> V3: Change to only handle NUMA_NO_NODE, and return cpu_online_mask > >> for NUMA_NO_NODE case, and change the commit log to better justify > >> the change. > >> --- > >> arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h | 4 ++-- > > > > Nit: the subject says "mips:", but this patch only touches sgi-ip27 and > > loongson is updated as a separate patch. I don't see why both patches > > cannot be merged. Moreover, the whole set can be made as a single patch, > > IMHO. > > Thanks for reviewing. > > As this patchset touches a few files, which may has different maintainer. > I am not sure if a separate patch for different arch will make the merging > process easy, or a single patch will make the merging process easy? The set makes the same logical change to several definitions of cpumask_of_node(). It's appropriate to have all these changes in a single patch. > It can be made as a single patch if a single patch will make the merging > process easy. > > > > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h > >> index 965f079..04505e6 100644 > >> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h > >> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/topology.h > >> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ struct cpuinfo_ip27 { > >> extern struct cpuinfo_ip27 sn_cpu_info[NR_CPUS]; > >> > >> #define cpu_to_node(cpu) (sn_cpu_info[(cpu)].p_nodeid) > >> -#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == -1 ? \ > >> - cpu_all_mask : \ > >> +#define cpumask_of_node(node) ((node) == NUMA_NO_NODE ? \ > >> + cpu_online_mask : \ > >> &hub_data(node)->h_cpus) > >> struct pci_bus; > >> extern int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *); > >> -- > >> 2.8.1 > >> > > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.