From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA83C4360C for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 09:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5E2421479 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 09:11:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D5E2421479 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46mHsr5RYXzDqR2 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 20:11:28 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46mHYw6MsLzDqCb for ; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 19:57:40 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CB58C057EC0; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 08:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t460s.redhat.com (ovpn-116-58.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.58]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EC55EE1D; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 08:57:36 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v6 08/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't check for "all holes" in shrink_zone_span() Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 10:56:44 +0200 Message-Id: <20191006085646.5768-9-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20191006085646.5768-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20191006085646.5768-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Sun, 06 Oct 2019 08:57:39 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Tatashin , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org, Wei Yang , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Oscar Salvador Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" If we have holes, the holes will automatically get detected and removed once we remove the next bigger/smaller section. The extra checks can go. Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Wei Yang Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- mm/memory_hotplug.c | 34 +++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index f294918f7211..8dafa1ba8d9f 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -393,6 +393,9 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, if (pfn) { zone->zone_start_pfn = pfn; zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn - pfn; + } else { + zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; + zone->spanned_pages = 0; } } else if (zone_end_pfn == end_pfn) { /* @@ -405,34 +408,11 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, start_pfn); if (pfn) zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone_start_pfn + 1; + else { + zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; + zone->spanned_pages = 0; + } } - - /* - * The section is not biggest or smallest mem_section in the zone, it - * only creates a hole in the zone. So in this case, we need not - * change the zone. But perhaps, the zone has only hole data. Thus - * it check the zone has only hole or not. - */ - pfn = zone_start_pfn; - for (; pfn < zone_end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION) { - if (unlikely(!pfn_to_online_page(pfn))) - continue; - - if (page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)) != zone) - continue; - - /* Skip range to be removed */ - if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn < end_pfn) - continue; - - /* If we find valid section, we have nothing to do */ - zone_span_writeunlock(zone); - return; - } - - /* The zone has no valid section */ - zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; - zone->spanned_pages = 0; zone_span_writeunlock(zone); } -- 2.21.0