From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F136C4CECE for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1CAB2084B for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TWTxU8aa" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F1CAB2084B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46sDjq3xRVzDqhK for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:06:39 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linuxfoundation.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TWTxU8aa"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46sDgQ2P8zzDqgq for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:04:32 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93474207FF; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:04:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1571047470; bh=1L6BHHyZGzdbxZWv4acGRnc0Va1vbCVjc4KDhtWjTqM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=TWTxU8aaHNdrVeedNaAfxRnATKwQqldi45eCabLzrJUjucHv6x6k8odH8CVoEQbPR w4oWGHOb3hLuaMuJ2jSTXq/ppPzZIjrhbS4OaxKJeinja9bxujNH+7bHo+Z4BvD0Vx z3dLPHIeCCsbnOLqYk6lsozxHfWvVXR06RTUURHI= Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:04:27 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] numa: make node_to_cpumask_map() NUMA_NO_NODE aware Message-ID: <20191014100427.GA6307@kroah.com> References: <6cc94f9b-0d79-93a8-5ec2-4f6c21639268@huawei.com> <20191011111539.GX2311@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <7fad58d6-5126-e8b8-a7d8-a91814da53ba@huawei.com> <20191012074014.GA2037204@kroah.com> <1e1ec851-b5e7-8f35-a627-4c12ca9c2d3c@huawei.com> <20191012104001.GA2052933@kroah.com> <20191012104742.GA2053473@kroah.com> <82000bc8-6912-205b-0251-25b9cc430973@huawei.com> <20191014092509.GA3050088@kroah.com> <20191014094912.GY2311@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191014094912.GY2311@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, Michal Hocko , mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org, cai@lca.pw, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Yunsheng Lin , rppt@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, jhogan@kernel.org, mattst88@gmail.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rth@twiddle.net, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, tbogendoerfer@suse.de, paul.burton@mips.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Robin Murphy , davem@davemloft.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:49:12AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:25:09AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > Good luck, I don't really think that most, if any, of this is needed, > > but hey, it's nice to clean it up where it can be :) > > Some of the virtual devices we have (that use devm) really ought to set > the node too, like drivers/base/cpu.c and driver/base/node.c and > arguably the cooling devices too (they create a device per cpu). > > The patch I had here: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190925214526.GA4643@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net > > takes the more radical approach of requiring a node, except when > explicitly marked not (the fake devices that don't use devm for > example). I like that patch :) > But yes, PCI and other physical busses really should be having a node > set, no excuses. Agreed, at least just warning on the bus creation will make it a bit less "noisy", in contrast to your patch. But the messages in your patch show people just how broken their bioses really are. Which is always fun... > Anyway, I don't think non-physical devices actually use > cpumask_of_node() much, a quick grep didn't show any. That's good. thanks, greg k-h