From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0B0C10F14 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37FCC20854 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:48:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 37FCC20854 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46t2wP2787zDr5T for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 04:48:37 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=arm.com (client-ip=217.140.110.172; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=catalin.marinas@arm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46t2st5W5bzDr0D for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 04:46:23 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72400337; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arrakis.emea.arm.com (arrakis.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C13993F6C4; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:46:16 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] ARM: Raspberry Pi 4 DMA support Message-ID: <20191015174616.GO13874@arrakis.emea.arm.com> References: <20191014183108.24804-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> <20191014205859.GA7634@iMac-3.local> <384b42df01c0af973002fba0d5f02068e7f2e7b3.camel@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <384b42df01c0af973002fba0d5f02068e7f2e7b3.camel@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, Robin Murphy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, mbrugger@suse.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wahrenst@gmx.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:48:22AM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > A little off topic but I was wondering if you have a preferred way to refer to > the arm architecture in a way that it unambiguously excludes arm64 (for example > arm32 would work). arm32 should be fine. Neither arm64 nor arm32 are officially endorsed ARM Ltd names (officially the exception model is AArch32 while the instruction set is one of A32/T32/T16). -- Catalin