From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052C6C432C0 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 21:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF642064B for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 21:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="eDw8REuP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6FF642064B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47MyCx2gK4zDq6k for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 08:46:53 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::341; helo=mail-wm1-x341.google.com; envelope-from=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="eDw8REuP"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com (mail-wm1-x341.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::341]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47My9Y6Wg8zDqlJ for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 08:44:49 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id u18so4866697wmc.3 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:44:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=3TCvikHiROllDrcma+CvPeIZvgOAa0DLqL9aOfiW+v0=; b=eDw8REuPwOPqWU2sJ0BdoRVPWKUzTj0YbRhRQicf7aRtg+PGgtxw8sQrt+ehKPldab 5Dwy2fhc9u1vkpmctrriVLMl8oM14lEykl7FUpFaq7z8DZyPiTAQ15aQY/539wKteIsr PisqlDWBEUmELtSDpWswAvRPvWzb8PxcFGyB2YSldaUc/KJNZJ5xSrFXBExtlQZTtnbi yVA2wl3bFw8rtMJHYIgKpbAr6viP0/SLeXLVyjJVpba+oUcFvxhU8axe3RmrwZPRAH1E jeSYxPlmbTqb3sH23BN2jiUb/FCQyeEIIuvJJsNlYeo/G+mKIf/K+yryI7MdWHcPfB6w 86kQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=3TCvikHiROllDrcma+CvPeIZvgOAa0DLqL9aOfiW+v0=; b=tPfPP4VCsyBxzSxcPtBYwlGlZksF/A+0j0SKgdamIOPSxi0jIIVeftZN8uiGPR8kpA /j1Sx1oqHxuePvzYhuZVVTTdyKidoZR9jkGwAYWfatad03Y6M2J+laM/l+CNIQHwSCMH I4IAHL6Ihj3qMTnUN357+/udEANIkssca1sxgEga6kZn3kcwFTBrXTJEKZNlO3MOYSEl iFCa2AcpFVknd4tmTvUXjqdr/FySU6cBt8ZzHKXm+bQFYPPRCQYFOu1sM9Kupgih7pYF 8ziaeuO3z8iqypdvcgmIcbTwpzhRdy5CiJppm1UY6jjlJhN5EkNTX7gmyWLMpJItEMGF eAgg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXrrtymKRNvvhkhq9InayRAejeKqgwTVccYOkTPLOi3v1K2HEa5 FKWAr6HBHpGlGizznTe+Uds= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzKuSB3cAu0EuiMT+9vrB+n7dd0HVpAtyzd2Elni0TH64QZnLUu2tuPSqhTHT8AOVtai1OAWg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f20c:: with SMTP id s12mr999955wmc.37.1574804683968; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:44:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ltop.local ([2a02:a03f:404e:f500:ac14:4c10:6104:457f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x10sm16353061wrp.58.2019.11.26.13.44.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:44:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:44:41 +0100 From: Luc Van Oostenryck To: Michal Suchanek Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 26/35] powerpc/64: system call: Fix sparse warning about missing declaration Message-ID: <20191126214441.4wziibsax2mvpl3p@ltop.local> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan , David Hildenbrand , Heiko Carstens , Claudio Carvalho , David Howells , Masahiro Yamada , Paul Mackerras , Christian Brauner , Breno Leitao , Michael Neuling , Nicolai Stange , Diana Craciun , Firoz Khan , Dmitry Vyukov , Mahesh Salgaonkar , Geert Uytterhoeven , "Naveen N. Rao" , Valentin Schneider , Jagadeesh Pagadala , Arnd Bergmann , Nicholas Piggin , Alexander Viro , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Allison Randal , Daniel Axtens , Gustavo Romero , Mathieu Malaterre , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Oleg Nesterov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Andrew Donnellan , Brajeswar Ghosh , Hari Bathini , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:13:40PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > Sparse warns about missing declarations for these functions: > > +arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c:108:23: warning: symbol 'syscall_exit_prepare' was not declared. Should it be static? > +arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c:18:6: warning: symbol 'system_call_exception' was not declared. Should it be static? > +arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c:200:23: warning: symbol 'interrupt_exit_user_prepare' was not declared. Should it be static? > +arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall_64.c:288:23: warning: symbol 'interrupt_exit_kernel_prepare' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Add declaration for them. I'm fine with this patch but, just FYI, lately people seems to prefer to add '__visible' to the function definition instead of creating such header files. Best regards, -- Luc Van Oostenryck