From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F21C2D0CF for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 255C520643 for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:24:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 255C520643 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47j1lQ4sHKzDqCT for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 03:24:50 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47j1jK4xgdzDq7F for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2019 03:23:01 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xBOGGvUH061246 for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 11:22:58 -0500 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2x21wcke7y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 11:22:58 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:22:56 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:22:53 -0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xBOGMqP353805150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:22:52 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F6911C050; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:22:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7232111C058; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:22:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.vnet.ibm.com (unknown [9.126.150.29]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 16:22:51 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 21:52:50 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/shared: include correct header for static key References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19122416-0016-0000-0000-000002D7DCCF X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19122416-0017-0000-0000-0000333A328F Message-Id: <20191224162250.GA1781@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-24_04:2019-12-24,2019-12-24 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912240142 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: longman@redhat.com, pauld@redhat.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" * Jason A. Donenfeld [2019-12-23 14:31:47]: > Recently, the spinlock implementation grew a static key optimization, > but the jump_label.h header include was left out, leading to build > errors: > > linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h:44:7: error: implicit declaration of function ???static_branch_unlikely??? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 44 | if (!static_branch_unlikely(&shared_processor)) > > This commit adds the missing header. Right, This was in v4 version of the patchset (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191212085344.17357-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com) but we missed it in the final v5 version. Thanks for noticing and fixing it. Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju > > Fixes: 656c21d6af5d ("powerpc/shared: Use static key to detect shared processor") > Cc: Srikar Dronamraju > Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h > index 1b55fc08f853..860228e917dc 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ > * > * (the type definitions are in asm/spinlock_types.h) > */ > +#include > #include > #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 > #include > -- > 2.24.1 > -- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju