From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B90CC33CB6 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43669246E9 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="okHWbA6w" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 43669246E9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47zBH10q2rzDqZP for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 04:37:49 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=sashal@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=okHWbA6w; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47z9Tc6LbrzDqbB for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 04:01:56 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02CEE21582; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:01:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1579194114; bh=YQ/Hcyv+U1F9awMquJDtHPpWKxuAbPdy3YF5Mp56J9o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=okHWbA6wXlGlsJ4rqusMjuzWgrtmD2JPeVrc6MGyVmdRYcbtPmJ+GY7DrkzIlgxuF EI7B+PMmDs3wkQ1kGJSNCt/rMMJsHhoao5qzitdMofd+QXXXVoL4z0I8EobcrcnL6w TdqjHTloCOr9O9n8MnMsKO2+QCW7MMrICWYch4vE= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 210/671] powerpc/64s: Fix logic when handling unknown CPU features Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:51:59 -0500 Message-Id: <20200116165940.10720-93-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200116165940.10720-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20200116165940.10720-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sasha Levin , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Andrew Donnellan Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Michael Ellerman [ Upstream commit 8cfaf106918a8c13abb24c641556172afbb9545c ] In cpufeatures_process_feature(), if a provided CPU feature is unknown and enable_unknown is false, we erroneously print that the feature is being enabled and return true, even though no feature has been enabled, and may also set feature bits based on the last entry in the match table. Fix this so that we only set feature bits from the match table if we have actually enabled a feature from that table, and when failing to enable an unknown feature, always print the "not enabling" message and return false. Coincidentally, some older gccs (cpu_ftr_bit_mask) An upcoming patch will enable support for kcov, which requires this option. This patch avoids the warning. Fixes: 5a61ef74f269 ("powerpc/64s: Support new device tree binding for discovering CPU features") Reported-by: Segher Boessenkool Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman [ajd: add commit message] Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 17 +++++++---------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c index c6f41907f0d7..a4b31e17492d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c @@ -666,8 +666,10 @@ static bool __init cpufeatures_process_feature(struct dt_cpu_feature *f) m = &dt_cpu_feature_match_table[i]; if (!strcmp(f->name, m->name)) { known = true; - if (m->enable(f)) + if (m->enable(f)) { + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= m->cpu_ftr_bit_mask; break; + } pr_info("not enabling: %s (disabled or unsupported by kernel)\n", f->name); @@ -675,17 +677,12 @@ static bool __init cpufeatures_process_feature(struct dt_cpu_feature *f) } } - if (!known && enable_unknown) { - if (!feat_try_enable_unknown(f)) { - pr_info("not enabling: %s (unknown and unsupported by kernel)\n", - f->name); - return false; - } + if (!known && (!enable_unknown || !feat_try_enable_unknown(f))) { + pr_info("not enabling: %s (unknown and unsupported by kernel)\n", + f->name); + return false; } - if (m->cpu_ftr_bit_mask) - cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= m->cpu_ftr_bit_mask; - if (known) pr_debug("enabling: %s\n", f->name); else -- 2.20.1