From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00655C2D0DB for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:02:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98639206F0 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:02:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 98639206F0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4874tJ3shJzDqSD for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 01:02:16 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4874h65WRTzDqPQ for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:53:26 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00TDorTm180216 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:53:23 -0500 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xu5x8u1rc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:53:22 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:53:21 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:53:18 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 00TDrHKZ58720318 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:53:18 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1812A4062; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:53:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFB0A4054; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:53:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srikart450.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.193.110.254]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:53:15 +0000 (GMT) From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH v6 3/5] powerpc/numa: Use cpu node map of first sibling thread Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:22:59 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200129135301.24739-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20200129135301.24739-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20012913-0028-0000-0000-000003D58038 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20012913-0029-0000-0000-00002499CBA2 Message-Id: <20200129135301.24739-4-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-29_03:2020-01-28, 2020-01-29 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=988 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1911200001 definitions=main-2001290115 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nathan Lynch , Srikar Dronamraju , Nicholas Piggin , Abdul Haleem , Satheesh Rajendran , linuxppc-dev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" All the sibling threads of a core have to be part of the same node. To ensure that all the sibling threads map to the same node, always lookup/update the cpu-to-node map of the first thread in the core. Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Nicholas Piggin Cc: Nathan Lynch Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Abdul Haleem Cc: Satheesh Rajendran Reported-by: Abdul Haleem Reviewed-by: Nathan Lynch --- Changelog: v3->v4 As suggested by Nathan, add a warning while mapping offline cpu. arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c index 8fbe57c..63ec0c3 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c @@ -467,15 +467,20 @@ static int of_drconf_to_nid_single(struct drmem_lmb *lmb) */ static int numa_setup_cpu(unsigned long lcpu) { - int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE; struct device_node *cpu; + int fcpu = cpu_first_thread_sibling(lcpu); + int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE; /* * If a valid cpu-to-node mapping is already available, use it * directly instead of querying the firmware, since it represents * the most recent mapping notified to us by the platform (eg: VPHN). + * Since cpu_to_node binding remains the same for all threads in the + * core. If a valid cpu-to-node mapping is already available, for + * the first thread in the core, use it. */ - if ((nid = numa_cpu_lookup_table[lcpu]) >= 0) { + nid = numa_cpu_lookup_table[fcpu]; + if (nid >= 0) { map_cpu_to_node(lcpu, nid); return nid; } @@ -496,6 +501,19 @@ static int numa_setup_cpu(unsigned long lcpu) if (nid < 0 || !node_possible(nid)) nid = first_online_node; + /* + * Update for the first thread of the core. All threads of a core + * have to be part of the same node. This not only avoids querying + * for every other thread in the core, but always avoids a case + * where virtual node associativity change causes subsequent threads + * of a core to be associated with different nid. However if first + * thread is already online, expect it to have a valid mapping. + */ + if (fcpu != lcpu) { + WARN_ON(cpu_online(fcpu)); + map_cpu_to_node(fcpu, nid); + } + map_cpu_to_node(lcpu, nid); of_node_put(cpu); out: -- 1.8.3.1