From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C8EC33C9E for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BBB206D5 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:31:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 30BBB206D5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487X9L2YwzzDqs6 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:31:50 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=rppt@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 487X5152QlzDqfL for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:28:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00U7PPcu072736 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 02:28:01 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xueh6v64s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 02:28:00 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:57 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:47 -0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 00U7Rk2i44564690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:47 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD406AE051; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C847AE04D; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.148.8.154]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:27:43 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 09:27:41 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Gerald Schaefer Subject: Re: [PATCH V12] mm/debug: Add tests validating architecture page table helpers References: <1580174873-18117-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <14882A91-17DE-4ABD-ABF2-08E7CCEDF660@lca.pw> <214c0d53-eb34-9b0c-2e4e-1aa005146331@arm.com> <016A776F-EFD9-4D2B-A3A9-788008617D95@lca.pw> <20200129232044.2d133d98@thinkpad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200129232044.2d133d98@thinkpad> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20013007-0008-0000-0000-0000034DFF2E X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20013007-0009-0000-0000-00004A6E7E76 Message-Id: <20200130072741.GA23707@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-30_01:2020-01-28, 2020-01-30 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=56 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1911200001 definitions=main-2001300050 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , James Hogan , Tetsuo Handa , Heiko Carstens , Michal Hocko , Linux-MM , Paul Mackerras , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , Matthew Wilcox , Steven Price , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Ingo Molnar , Kees Cook , Anshuman Khandual , Masahiro Yamada , Mark Brown , Qian Cai , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Dan Williams , Vlastimil Babka , Sri Krishna chowdary , Ard Biesheuvel , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dave Hansen , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Burton , Mike Rapoport , Vineet Gupta , Martin Schwidefsky , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:20:44PM +0100, Gerald Schaefer wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 22:33:08 -0500 > > For example, who would have thought that pXd_bad() is supposed to > report large entries as bad? It's not really documented anywhere, A bit off-topic, @Anshuman, maybe you could start a Documentation/ patch that describes at least some of the pXd_whaterver()? Or that would be too much to ask? ;-) > so we just checked them for sanity like normal entries, which > apparently worked fine so far, but for how long? -- Sincerely yours, Mike.