From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc/smp: Use nid as fallback for package_id
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 18:48:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200130131852.GB28610@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200130105747.GD1988@in.ibm.com>
* Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2020-01-30 16:27:47]:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 07:21:21PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> [..snip..]
>
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -1185,10 +1185,34 @@ static inline void add_cpu_to_smallcore_masks(int cpu)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +int get_physical_package_id(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + int ppid = cpu_to_chip_id(cpu);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR
> > + /*
> > + * If the platform is PowerNV or Guest on KVM, ibm,chip-id is
> > + * defined. Hence we would return the chip-id as the
> > + * get_physical_package_id.
> > + */
> > + if (ppid == -1 && firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR)) {
> > + struct device_node *np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> > +
> > + if (np) {
> > + ppid = of_node_to_nid(np);
> > + of_node_put(np);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR */
> > +
> > + return ppid;
> > +}
> > static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
> > {
> > int first_thread = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
> > - int chipid = cpu_to_chip_id(cpu);
> > + int ppid = get_physical_package_id(cpu);
> > int i;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -1217,11 +1241,11 @@ static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
> > for_each_cpu(i, cpu_l2_cache_mask(cpu))
> > set_cpus_related(cpu, i, cpu_core_mask);
> >
> > - if (chipid == -1)
> > + if (ppid == -1)
> > return;
>
> Can get_physical_package_id() return -1 ?
>
Yes, it can return -1,
1. A System doesnt have CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR: cpu_to_chip_id() might return -1.
2. A System with CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR: Still can return -1 for following cases.
a. Not having firmware feature FW_FEATURE_LPAR
b. If for some reason, of_get_cpu_node property is not present.
> >
> > for_each_cpu(i, cpu_online_mask)
> > - if (cpu_to_chip_id(i) == chipid)
> > + if (get_physical_package_id(i) == ppid)
> > set_cpus_related(cpu, i, cpu_core_mask);
> > }
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-30 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-29 13:51 [PATCH v4] powerpc/smp: Use nid as fallback for package_id Srikar Dronamraju
2020-01-30 10:57 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-01-30 13:18 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2020-03-06 0:27 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200130131852.GB28610@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).