From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49821C35254 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE7D320702 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dM56oyW0" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EE7D320702 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CP7J3pVszDqSV for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 01:28:28 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=207.211.31.120; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com; envelope-from=bhe@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=dM56oyW0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CP5725spzDqC9 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 01:26:34 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1580912791; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KAdV3hA+UnlwePFUiQQxF7Qhd3fY3tGdtbme44OOFs8=; b=dM56oyW0PLeC7lZcKtklhPL2Tcba9dYouSmR8HUQlYqmJoWyLefQjkvWawkoKvTCTVoo95 HROmfvZ4K9g/7GDR1LKIUELUzKnhIBFjgyd9cmb+oY/oXsm2SftkJs4/goXUgyEeaJeNaC ux7m9uwcb90bFQeteCZzBhb2LdmFJhs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-371-OBZq-5t8Nwu9IXhE-e1YOQ-1; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:26:26 -0500 X-MC-Unique: OBZq-5t8Nwu9IXhE-e1YOQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 209311081FA3; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-97.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.97]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56DD25C1B5; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 22:26:18 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't check for "all holes" in shrink_zone_span() Message-ID: <20200205142618.GE8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20191006085646.5768-1-david@redhat.com> <20191006085646.5768-9-david@redhat.com> <20200204142516.GD26758@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20200205124329.GE26758@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20200205133442.GC8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <2868343a-745b-e2b6-7e78-d5649c00ee31@redhat.com> <20200205141254.GD8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Tatashin , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Wei Yang , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Oscar Salvador Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 02/05/20 at 03:16pm, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >>>> Anyhow, that patch is already upstream and I don't consider this high > >>>> priority. Thanks :) > >>> > >>> Yeah, noticed you told Wei the status in another patch thread, I am fine > >>> with it, just leave it to you to decide. Thanks. > >> > >> I am fairly busy right now. Can you send a patch (double-checking and > >> making this eventually unconditional?). Thanks! > > > > Understood, sorry about the noise, David. I will think about this. > > > > No need to excuse, really, I'm very happy about review feedback! > Glad to hear it, thanks. > The review of this series happened fairly late. Bad, because it's not > perfect, but good, because no serious stuff was found (so far :) ). If > you also don't have time to look into this, I can put it onto my todo > list, just let me know. Both is OK to me, as long as thing is clear to us. I will discuss with Wei Yang for now. You can post patch anytime if you make one.