From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: vdso function descriptors (VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS)?
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 11:08:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200217160852.GA9557@redhat.com> (raw)
I was wondering if there was history behind VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS and in
what cases would one want to turn them on? (Note, I'm assuming they are
an implementation of Function Descriptors. [1])
arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso.h unsets the macro:
/* Define if 64 bits VDSO has procedure descriptors */
#undef VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS
so I don't believe they are ever used by default -- in this case
V_FUNCTION_BEGIN doesn't add to the .opd section with .name, .TOC base,
etc.
Manually setting VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS results in a vdso64.so in which
binutils tools like readelf properly report functions with symbol type
FUNC instead of NOTYPE.
Are there pieces of the build/etc toolchain unprepared for function
descriptors? I'm just trying to figure out why the code defaults to
unsetting them.
Thanks,
-- Joe
[1] http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/ELF/ppc64/PPC-elf64abi.html#FUNC-DES
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-17 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-17 16:08 Joe Lawrence [this message]
2020-02-23 0:07 ` vdso function descriptors (VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS)? Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-24 10:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-02-24 15:20 ` Joe Lawrence
2020-02-24 15:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-02-24 21:18 ` [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: remove deprecated VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS references Joe Lawrence
2020-02-24 23:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-17 13:14 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200217160852.GA9557@redhat.com \
--to=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).