From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18045C761A1 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 05:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD0DB24656 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 05:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fossix-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@fossix-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Ke4TfJBR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BD0DB24656 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=fossix.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48NNkH0RCLzDqTy for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:41:27 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=fossix.org (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::642; helo=mail-pl1-x642.google.com; envelope-from=santosh@fossix.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=fossix.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=fossix-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@fossix-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20150623 header.b=Ke4TfJBR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x642.google.com (mail-pl1-x642.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::642]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48NNb94v7NzDqRM for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:35:17 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x642.google.com with SMTP id g6so1091458plt.2 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:35:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fossix-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O+8M5jtgLjgQ0v7PKXy7oWEHkbPSh3Q2i8vceLU2544=; b=Ke4TfJBRe49G7ujS6YVWhwX++L5h99klNWGMqDCGnvG9byvEOgANScAdmcPvYzYUOz maroLPU55MzNtCH57NWE1BvY+3VXPmUT6FxK8fGcHZxt1+loIaCpX67Xt1KL+2oF4KlP x6ort9hxTrwiVbbkbTs1xE1LhjzLPq3mYVgwHzJBIfmTmy5OG9jocp1sQJooYicJ3n64 VNIr2x/4CegasAdz/utoBYiHYgqTJbQc2F11lQXzh3nnmOWemiMgbKmfmUNaTVfVLVfE My29fdEQr7CY6YVixiBhA11Qh6v9m3AfMh63WOgy2bADLvOb7rT5N1dcUS/bMtxwr4su ylsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O+8M5jtgLjgQ0v7PKXy7oWEHkbPSh3Q2i8vceLU2544=; b=ImDgmuOhMj+RLFpd7HGtEK2c94aazEMq6qzCxqL6YW+zgrU64kyCXkOWJ0xiBOIDYg i+U2udnlbnRuEFie9h4AZ4FMMyN/denA38TccTBCsf+D1vRCQAlogBRuA9WkGJhfEX6x Te65hR+/age111m2mGLmGGhgkjihxHE6926DDkiECLygtGb/xxZkbp9fAhUIDoofIBNs 3r4EyoqMgelJ2xVs4YPptJCgfjp1SpxVqKoeLE6bAxGSTxhBH63npMxuejv805h0drCN o6a0FHajjqZvLnocvCDRIUJoseV12RQhdLMLu8hjD2rYuRSws69ZAxRbfKtotysw2lB1 hPng== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWUsJdBiLHzKyiTP4Sug2l9FVBXKZqFs2S8YCjZGed74uvSJX2/ DjIUz93H5wkTkHmWrnSKHS+TRyc6KLA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxmEcWsMKkzIQ1z22oCIBh7c9rLRiBeIrbRZhJhzh40svmuWkxsXEzjf8MafCaSNtFN+F/hig== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6ac3:: with SMTP id i3mr29353814plt.111.1582176915371; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:35:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from santosiv.in.ibm.com ([129.41.84.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r11sm1664262pgi.9.2020.02.19.21.35.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:35:14 -0800 (PST) From: Santosh Sivaraj To: linuxppc-dev , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 3/6] asm-generic/tlb, arch: Invert CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_INVALIDATE Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:04:54 +0530 Message-Id: <20200220053457.930231-4-santosh@fossix.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200220053457.930231-1-santosh@fossix.org> References: <20200220053457.930231-1-santosh@fossix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peterz@infradead.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, akshay.adiga@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Peter Zijlstra Make issuing a TLB invalidate for page-table pages the normal case. The reason is twofold: - too many invalidates is safer than too few, - most architectures use the linux page-tables natively and would thus require this. Make it an opt-out, instead of an opt-in. No change in behavior intended. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: # 4.19 Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj [santosh: prerequisite for upcoming tlbflush backports] --- arch/Kconfig | 2 +- arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 + arch/sparc/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 - mm/memory.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig index a336548487e6..061a12b8140e 100644 --- a/arch/Kconfig +++ b/arch/Kconfig @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL config HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE bool -config HAVE_RCU_TABLE_INVALIDATE +config HAVE_RCU_TABLE_NO_INVALIDATE bool config ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig index a80669209155..f7f046ff6407 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ config PPC select HAVE_PERF_REGS select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP + select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_NO_INVALIDATE if HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE if PPC64 && CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig index e6f2a38d2e61..d90d632868aa 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ config SPARC64 select HAVE_KRETPROBES select HAVE_KPROBES select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP + select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_NO_INVALIDATE if HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index af35f5caadbe..181d0d522977 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -181,7 +181,6 @@ config X86 select HAVE_PERF_REGS select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if PARAVIRT - select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_INVALIDATE if HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE if X86_64 && (UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER || UNWINDER_ORC) && STACK_VALIDATION select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR if CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 1832c5ed6ac0..ba5689610c04 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ bool __tlb_remove_page_size(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct page *page, int page_ */ static inline void tlb_table_invalidate(struct mmu_gather *tlb) { -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_INVALIDATE +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_NO_INVALIDATE /* * Invalidate page-table caches used by hardware walkers. Then we still * need to RCU-sched wait while freeing the pages because software -- 2.24.1