From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D166C11D05 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B072B20658 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Tw6lme9c" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B072B20658 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48Nfls5Jz2zDqZD for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:13:45 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=sashal@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Tw6lme9c; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Nfk76LdtzDqWn for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:12:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CF9B20658; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:12:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582215133; bh=7sh9tmZCNa/XG2MFk6jwAzLZ290b8gu6jJpshQH8oBk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Tw6lme9cckLT8eZtoLZ70Lm5AzuDcvbStw+EMEzKYsN1j6lkpTcp5avqdF8UJRLUF Jv2+WimGHRjAJYL9cy6ojcPmcejgLEosDQKOYH6yUcHM1c6tvZTJa9A1rTAQUU+49O cNPyqrZk/gATUiD+2SQgllJOlko0vPz4wcLJqCDw= Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:12:12 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: Frederic Barrat Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 096/542] powerpc/powernv/ioda: Fix ref count for devices with their own PE Message-ID: <20200220161212.GC1734@sasha-vm> References: <20200214154854.6746-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20200214154854.6746-96-sashal@kernel.org> <0867167a-73b8-0735-78ce-0d984f7a80b5@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0867167a-73b8-0735-78ce-0d984f7a80b5@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Donnellan Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:49:41AM +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote: > > >Le 14/02/2020 à 16:41, Sasha Levin a écrit : >>From: Frederic Barrat >> >>[ Upstream commit 05dd7da76986937fb288b4213b1fa10dbe0d1b33 ] > > >Hi, > >Upstream commit 05dd7da76986937fb288b4213b1fa10dbe0d1b33 doesn't >really need to go to stable (any of 4.19, 5.4 and 5.5). While it's >probably safe, the patch replaces a refcount leak by another one, >which makes sense as part of the full series merged in 5.6-rc1, but >isn't terribly useful standalone on the current stable branches. I'll drop it, thank you. -- Thanks, Sasha