From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
To: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>,
mikey@neuling.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/watchpoint: Don't call dar_within_range() for Book3S
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:50:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200222082049.330435-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
DAR is set to the first byte of overlap between actual access and
watched range at DSI on Book3S processor. But actual access range
might or might not be within user asked range. So for Book3S, it
must not call dar_within_range().
This revert portion of commit 39413ae00967 ("powerpc/hw_breakpoints:
Rewrite 8xx breakpoints to allow any address range size.").
Before patch:
# ./tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/perf-hwbreak
...
TESTED: No overlap
FAILED: Partial overlap: 0 != 2
TESTED: Partial overlap
TESTED: No overlap
FAILED: Full overlap: 0 != 2
failure: perf_hwbreak
After patch:
TESTED: No overlap
TESTED: Partial overlap
TESTED: Partial overlap
TESTED: No overlap
TESTED: Full overlap
success: perf_hwbreak
Fixes: 39413ae00967 ("powerpc/hw_breakpoints: Rewrite 8xx breakpoints to allow any address range size.")
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 2462cd7c565c..d0854320bb50 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -331,11 +331,13 @@ int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args)
}
info->type &= ~HW_BRK_TYPE_EXTRANEOUS_IRQ;
- if (!dar_within_range(regs->dar, info))
- info->type |= HW_BRK_TYPE_EXTRANEOUS_IRQ;
-
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && !stepping_handler(regs, bp, info))
- goto out;
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx)) {
+ if (!dar_within_range(regs->dar, info))
+ info->type |= HW_BRK_TYPE_EXTRANEOUS_IRQ;
+ } else {
+ if (!stepping_handler(regs, bp, info))
+ goto out;
+ }
/*
* As a policy, the callback is invoked in a 'trigger-after-execute'
--
2.21.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-22 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-22 8:20 Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2020-02-22 11:26 ` [PATCH] powerpc/watchpoint: Don't call dar_within_range() for Book3S Christophe Leroy
2020-02-22 13:16 ` Ravi Bangoria
2020-02-27 12:31 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200222082049.330435-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).