From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B77C4BA06 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DD62072D for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:19:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A3DD62072D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48SkZL6L9szDr0B for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:19:38 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Sk4f0bhkzDqlB for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:57:21 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01R6sHPB119268; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:57:16 -0500 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ydqfvhrum-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:57:15 -0500 Received: from m0098421.ppops.net (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 01R6sq8q120821; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:57:15 -0500 Received: from ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (83.d6.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.214.131]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ydqfvhru3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:57:15 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 01R6ulvq025642; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:57:14 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.27]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2ydcmkx48q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:57:14 +0000 Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.106]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 01R6vDZd43713018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:57:13 GMT Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE57A28058; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:57:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9E628059; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:57:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skywalker.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.204.201.20]) by b01ledav001.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:57:11 +0000 (GMT) From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: npiggin@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, kirill@shutemov.name Subject: [RFC PATCH 11/21] powerpc/kvm/nested: Add helper to walk nested shadow linux page table. Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:26:10 +0530 Message-Id: <20200227065620.50804-12-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200227065620.50804-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200227065620.50804-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-27_01:2020-02-26, 2020-02-27 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002270054 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The locking rules for walking nested shadow linux page table is different from process scoped table. Hence add a helper for nested page table walk and also add check whether we are holding the right locks. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c index 7f1fc5db13ea..b2cc3eaec618 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c @@ -750,6 +750,24 @@ static struct kvm_nested_guest *kvmhv_find_nested(struct kvm *kvm, int lpid) return kvm->arch.nested_guests[lpid]; } +static pte_t *find_kvm_nested_guest_pte(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long lpid, + unsigned long ea, unsigned *hshift) +{ + struct kvm_nested_guest *gp; + pte_t *pte; + + gp = kvmhv_find_nested(kvm, lpid); + if (!gp) + return NULL; + + VM_WARN(!spin_is_locked(&kvm->mmu_lock), + "%s called with kvm mmu_lock not held \n", __func__); + pte = __find_linux_pte(gp->shadow_pgtable, ea, NULL, hshift); + + return pte; +} + + static inline bool kvmhv_n_rmap_is_equal(u64 rmap_1, u64 rmap_2) { return !((rmap_1 ^ rmap_2) & (RMAP_NESTED_LPID_MASK | @@ -792,19 +810,15 @@ static void kvmhv_update_nest_rmap_rc(struct kvm *kvm, u64 n_rmap, unsigned long clr, unsigned long set, unsigned long hpa, unsigned long mask) { - struct kvm_nested_guest *gp; unsigned long gpa; unsigned int shift, lpid; pte_t *ptep; gpa = n_rmap & RMAP_NESTED_GPA_MASK; lpid = (n_rmap & RMAP_NESTED_LPID_MASK) >> RMAP_NESTED_LPID_SHIFT; - gp = kvmhv_find_nested(kvm, lpid); - if (!gp) - return; /* Find the pte */ - ptep = __find_linux_pte(gp->shadow_pgtable, gpa, NULL, &shift); + ptep = find_kvm_nested_guest_pte(kvm, lpid, gpa, &shift); /* * If the pte is present and the pfn is still the same, update the pte. * If the pfn has changed then this is a stale rmap entry, the nested @@ -854,7 +868,7 @@ static void kvmhv_remove_nest_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 n_rmap, return; /* Find and invalidate the pte */ - ptep = __find_linux_pte(gp->shadow_pgtable, gpa, NULL, &shift); + ptep = find_kvm_nested_guest_pte(kvm, lpid, gpa, &shift); /* Don't spuriously invalidate ptes if the pfn has changed */ if (ptep && pte_present(*ptep) && ((pte_val(*ptep) & mask) == hpa)) kvmppc_unmap_pte(kvm, ptep, gpa, shift, NULL, gp->shadow_lpid); @@ -921,7 +935,7 @@ static bool kvmhv_invalidate_shadow_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int shift; spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock); - ptep = __find_linux_pte(gp->shadow_pgtable, gpa, NULL, &shift); + ptep = find_kvm_nested_guest_pte(kvm, gp->l1_lpid, gpa, &shift); if (!shift) shift = PAGE_SHIFT; if (ptep && pte_present(*ptep)) { -- 2.24.1