From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07E9C10F25 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 21:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E3E724649 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 21:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Mc3f2TGu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1E3E724649 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48brkk5gVFzDqZC for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:21:34 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=209.85.214.195; helo=mail-pl1-f195.google.com; envelope-from=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Received: from mail-pl1-f195.google.com (mail-pl1-f195.google.com [209.85.214.195]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48brhJ0cYrzDqNx for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 08:19:27 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pl1-f195.google.com with SMTP id a23so1810126plm.1 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:19:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=75BMaXcAmO4F5Wh+UkrqpyAJEuiai75tQOLAGLzUruc=; b=Mc3f2TGua+mzWZqhqcBFy8xGR4f62bMfkZ533/dtz8uiLUdJhj/KUeALKn1cfWNrgL fIQti2Sr9jF85Y+rnxx4+60P16SUP3noRF2AljLUI1D2TFMmP1bonRiTwzjx4xNJ9Qwe 5ZwVhdVsIL82iYY0GFFZP9ck6Ccro9zA/NCVMYqPyiZzOtN5c7Gv+TLxZguS9lB7Xon4 hDadFff6ReYzd5WneH3sHbliE6rYSdrwuC0imPmRhArAKnt1MskwGQAGVLXRnAlhKQtL kwBImHlUMMDcum7ZL8MZBJ/YPV3RAGp0y3mQHGzC9a7UWHTJnrktv2CJw6iWWZrfotr5 SlVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=75BMaXcAmO4F5Wh+UkrqpyAJEuiai75tQOLAGLzUruc=; b=aZaXYW6EK5njP43jG7JgU0G/Af+GuWZTGOWuOpH0MSjuqxzvPOxkKKKlKRagW8S63t 6jyjFhy7oiM45rTCruu646A/q2WaNT4amFm04vK/EgChwaF4w0jlX4p9h3uULhx8YqcU zvK4cZZbUMsEmd9LfC8CDrGeQyqQ+iV7wPz2tkin0tMht9DB7NaGoiUcYoyebNsBnzbA xEj88ZkB/VGWEsAmvOhOKJOCXj3CPOTPtHoqR6b8U+VxKQuqadhPvWCIpMGRzkmmXTdr YekIOCvJcgnupOZwO4cpHh7/wiN9uzk4YZkux0z3cN65bH2tYPARRpPzV7Znrejflrv6 V54g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1vaylZWBNw9hT1HqkCFvBpF9DDNmv5UipN+ICcwUXW6VgJk2oL fwQclaW+KRaLnTkPYmIuQsU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vt2yYWX7gJknQLuNcwuQzhGdS8aInh7+JZ9Mbaq0Z7M0IITbFjuVTv3VCNQfp0cXyneROITtg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:864a:: with SMTP id y10mr17943042plt.2.1583788704865; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com (thunderhill.nvidia.com. [216.228.112.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u24sm44614851pgo.83.2020.03.09.14.18.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:18:32 -0700 From: Nicolin Chen To: Shengjiu Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Support new property fsl,asrc-format Message-ID: <20200309211831.GA11333@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com> References: <266dccc836c11165ad91a301f24fe4f7ad2557be.1583725533.git.shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <266dccc836c11165ad91a301f24fe4f7ad2557be.1583725533.git.shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, timur@kernel.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, broonie@kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:58:29AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > In order to align with new ESARC, we add new property fsl,asrc-format. > The fsl,asrc-format can replace the fsl,asrc-width, driver > can accept format from devicetree, don't need to convert it to > format through width. > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang > --- > sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c > index 9ce55feaac22..32101b9a37b9 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c > +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c > @@ -680,17 +680,19 @@ static int fsl_asoc_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto asrc_fail; > } > > - ret = of_property_read_u32(asrc_np, "fsl,asrc-width", &width); > + ret = of_property_read_u32(asrc_np, "fsl,asrc-format", &priv->asrc_format); > if (ret) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get output rate\n"); Nice that your patch fixed my copy-n-paste typo here :) > - ret = -EINVAL; > - goto asrc_fail; > - } It'd be nicer to have a line of comments: /* Fallback to old binding; translate to asrc_format */ > + ret = of_property_read_u32(asrc_np, "fsl,asrc-width", &width); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get output width\n"); > + return ret; > + } > > - if (width == 24) > - priv->asrc_format = SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S24_LE; > - else > - priv->asrc_format = SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S16_LE; > + if (width == 24) > + priv->asrc_format = SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S24_LE; > + else > + priv->asrc_format = SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S16_LE; > + }