From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3FDC10DCE for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:13:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 790F1222C3 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:13:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 790F1222C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (unknown [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cSWH5lP6zDqVs for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:13:47 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cSTW3c6BzDqRC for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:12:15 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48cSTW21pSz9Bs4 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:12:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 48cSTW1Mp9z9sPR; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:12:15 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48cSTV3GLTz9sPJ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:12:13 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02AL9BRB076274; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:12:07 -0400 Received: from ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (1a.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.26]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ym7acd25w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:12:05 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 02AL9vIe006154; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:12:01 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.18]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2ym386wjda-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:12:01 +0000 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 02ALC0Ot46203328 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:12:00 GMT Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E047805E; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:12:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713B97805F; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:12:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (unknown [9.53.179.172]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:12:00 +0000 (GMT) From: Michael Roth To: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Fix H_CEDE return code for nested guests Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:11:28 -0500 Message-Id: <20200310211128.17672-1-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-10_15:2020-03-10, 2020-03-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1011 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003100125 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Gibson Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The h_cede_tm kvm-unit-test currently fails when run inside an L1 guest via the guest/nested hypervisor. ./run-tests.sh -v ... TESTNAME=h_cede_tm TIMEOUT=90s ACCEL= ./powerpc/run powerpc/tm.elf -smp 2,threads=2 -machine cap-htm=on -append "h_cede_tm" FAIL h_cede_tm (2 tests, 1 unexpected failures) While the test relates to transactional memory instructions, the actual failure is due to the return code of the H_CEDE hypercall, which is reported as 224 instead of 0. This happens even when no TM instructions are issued. 224 is the value placed in r3 to execute a hypercall for H_CEDE, and r3 is where the caller expects the return code to be placed upon return. In the case of guest running under a nested hypervisor, issuing H_CEDE causes a return from H_ENTER_NESTED. In this case H_CEDE is specially-handled immediately rather than later in kvmppc_pseries_do_hcall() as with most other hcalls, but we forget to set the return code for the caller, hence why kvm-unit-test sees the 224 return code and reports an error. Guest kernels generally don't check the return value of H_CEDE, so that likely explains why this hasn't caused issues outside of kvm-unit-tests so far. Fix this by setting r3 to 0 after we finish processing the H_CEDE. RHBZ: 1778556 Fixes: 4bad77799fed ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Handle hypercalls correctly when nested") Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: David Gibson Cc: Paul Mackerras Signed-off-by: Michael Roth --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c index 2cefd071b848..c0c43a733830 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c @@ -3616,6 +3616,7 @@ int kvmhv_p9_guest_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 time_limit, if (trap == BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_SYSCALL && !vcpu->arch.nested && kvmppc_get_gpr(vcpu, 3) == H_CEDE) { kvmppc_nested_cede(vcpu); + kvmppc_set_gpr(vcpu, 3, 0); trap = 0; } } else { -- 2.17.1