From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB86EC10F29 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E3F20663 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:15:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 74E3F20663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48hftr36L2zDqg8 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 04:15:16 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48hf7g2LxWzDqkD for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 03:41:18 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02HGWxQD085589 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:41:15 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yu0m3cegw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:41:15 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:41:14 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:41:10 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 02HGf9jx38666252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:41:09 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D92652052; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:41:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.vnet.ibm.com (unknown [9.126.150.29]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DD3D552050; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:41:06 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:11:06 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/slub: Use mem_node to allocate a new slab References: <3381CD91-AB3D-4773-BA04-E7A072A63968@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200317131753.4074-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200317131753.4074-3-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20031716-0012-0000-0000-00000392AA2A X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20031716-0013-0000-0000-000021CF8A02 Message-Id: <20200317164106.GB4879@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.645 definitions=2020-03-17_06:2020-03-17, 2020-03-17 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=602 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003170065 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Sachin Sant , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, Kirill Tkhai , Mel Gorman , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Bharata B Rao , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christopher Lameter Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" * Vlastimil Babka [2020-03-17 14:34:25]: > > > --- a/mm/slub.c > > +++ b/mm/slub.c > > @@ -1970,14 +1970,8 @@ static void *get_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node, > > struct kmem_cache_cpu *c) > > { > > void *object; > > - int searchnode = node; > > > > - if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) > > - searchnode = numa_mem_id(); > > - else if (!node_present_pages(node)) > > - searchnode = node_to_mem_node(node); > > - > > - object = get_partial_node(s, get_node(s, searchnode), c, flags); > > + object = get_partial_node(s, get_node(s, node), c, flags); > > if (object || node != NUMA_NO_NODE)> return object; > > > > return get_any_partial(s, flags, c); > > I.e. here in this if(), now node will never equal NUMA_NO_NODE (thanks to the > hunk below), thus the get_any_partial() call becomes dead code? Very true. Would it be okay if we remove the node != NUMA_NO_NODE if (object || node != NUMA_NO_NODE) return object; will now become if (object) return object; -- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju