linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Aishwarya R <aishwaryarj100@gmail.com>,
	"Erhard F." <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: powermac: Simplify reading the "reg" and "i2c-address" property
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:37:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200421093712.GA1241@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200415131916.23555-1-aishwaryarj100@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 750 bytes --]

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 06:49:14PM +0530, Aishwarya R wrote:
> >> Use of_property_read_u32 to read the "reg" and "i2c-address" property
> >> instead of using of_get_property to check the return values.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aishwarya R <aishwaryarj100@gmail.com>
> 
> > This is quite a fragile driver. Have you tested it on HW?
> 
> This change is not tested with the Hardware.
> But of_property_read_u32 is better here than generic of_get_property.
> This make sure that value read properly independent of system endianess.

This driver is only used on PPC_BE. And it is *very* fragile. The gain
is not enough for me to accept it without testing. Maybe Erhard (CCed)
is interested. If not, you may find someone on the ppc lists.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-21  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-08 10:03 [PATCH] i2c: powermac: Simplify reading the "reg" and "i2c-address" property Aishwarya R
2020-04-15 11:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-04-15 13:19 ` Aishwarya R
2020-04-21  9:37   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2020-04-22 21:07     ` Erhard F.
2020-04-26  8:32 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200421093712.GA1241@ninjato \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=aishwaryarj100@gmail.com \
    --cc=erhard_f@mailbox.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rfontana@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).