From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D85C2BA19 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896BB2087E for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TWYByTCO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 896BB2087E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495zRL4gv6zDqvZ for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:53:50 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=broonie@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=TWYByTCO; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495zNx706fzDqGm for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:51:45 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0335A2087E; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:51:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1587462703; bh=IauNheB062Hx5TwDVP9QGchcfHWEIwmMV2csGlvp1Co=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=TWYByTCOBPe9TYJ5N5O4IsoELB6F3vHA6O80HIcV8nnnmnt4k2pp52gP+/SHiQ274 OqB8JJuS9/+69Dpn4TETGnXou7VQGAOpACqRHUnK5+CAXauoiJOul79OPfh5fCEUuC 4xcWwon+SREvq5R5c8dKOQrmkudpJ9UixOjYUD38= Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:51:40 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Shengjiu Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_esai: Remove expensive print in irq handler Message-ID: <20200421095139.GA4540@sirena.org.uk> References: <1587458483-2166-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1587458483-2166-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> X-Cookie: Non-sequiturs make me eat lampshades. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, timur@kernel.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, tiwai@suse.com, perex@perex.cz, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, festevam@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:41:23PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > Use dev_dbg instead of dev_err in irq handler, the dev_err > is expensive, we don't need the message to be printed everytime, > which is almost a debug option. > if (esr & ESAI_ESR_RFF_MASK) > - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "isr: Receiving overrun\n"); > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Receiving overrun\n"); > =20 > if (esr & ESAI_ESR_TFE_MASK) > - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "isr: Transmission underrun\n"); > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "isr: Transmission underrun\n"); These are error messages which would suggest a problem that'd lead to data corruption, it seems bad not to try to flag that to the user - surely we've got bigger problems than performance if this happens? Perhaps convert to a ratelimited print if the issue is that when errors happen they happen a lot? --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl6ewiMACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CKwwf/Tpe5//zRDnlqtVpZt3Oxy35CTdjomxN1dhZTt7hBudQjOITkDCoiNst3 SEvHAoPl0m/Y5PyAiZGgZlxFxttzFt7kPUskvTeDXWhmWRWjErukhTFBAbsA/xZM AlHWU436vHLDv7G769/c+foQJxQQAnfiCmS2BOK/4K18HIMLgz+C6e78zEXkFPsX rkvU9CKIZYUwgNB/YJ00JHWTy99JeURMB9IhF5vz9u+rKO7fflOjF+o/XMsxHsVw YHYxXyu35bWT21LslOL2gsB5NWI6MIzRXOirDJKY3wHhzspdL3NkMOg0QFb3pSs0 ZHl2Tbk2fhTu7Aebf9LPYn11mmwaWA== =YObh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--