From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDEEC83000 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AA16206A1 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:06:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6AA16206A1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BWMM6g8xzDqLy for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:06:07 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net (client-ip=45.79.88.28; helo=ms.lwn.net; envelope-from=corbet@lwn.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49BWGl6fsPzDqj4 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:02:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9121944A; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:01:28 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/29] Convert files to ReST - part 2 Message-ID: <20200428130128.22c4b973@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:16:52 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > This is the second part of a series I wrote sometime ago where I manually > convert lots of files to be properly parsed by Sphinx as ReST files. > > As it touches on lot of stuff, this series is based on today's linux-next, > at tag next-20190617. > > The first version of this series had 57 patches. The first part with 28 patches > were already merged. Right now, there are still ~76 patches pending applying > (including this series), and that's because I opted to do ~1 patch per converted > directory. > > That sounds too much to be send on a single round. So, I'm opting to split > it on 3 parts for the conversion, plus a final patch adding orphaned books > to existing ones. > > Those patches should probably be good to be merged either by subsystem > maintainers or via the docs tree. So I'm happy to merge this set, but there is one thing that worries me a bit... > fs/cachefiles/Kconfig | 4 +- > fs/coda/Kconfig | 2 +- > fs/configfs/inode.c | 2 +- > fs/configfs/item.c | 2 +- > fs/fscache/Kconfig | 8 +- > fs/fscache/cache.c | 8 +- > fs/fscache/cookie.c | 2 +- > fs/fscache/object.c | 4 +- > fs/fscache/operation.c | 2 +- > fs/locks.c | 2 +- > include/linux/configfs.h | 2 +- > include/linux/fs_context.h | 2 +- > include/linux/fscache-cache.h | 4 +- > include/linux/fscache.h | 42 +- > include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 2 +- I'd feel a bit better if I could get an ack or two from filesystem folks before I venture that far out of my own yard...what say you all? Thanks, jon