From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A120C47254 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 07:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F13220663 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 07:38:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3F13220663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49GWm63ztqzDqdd for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 17:37:58 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49GWK52hlKzDqZT for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 17:18:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0457321o036477; Tue, 5 May 2020 03:17:54 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30s1swk9pe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 May 2020 03:17:54 -0400 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 04573tsM039905; Tue, 5 May 2020 03:17:54 -0400 Received: from ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (ba.79.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.121.186]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30s1swk9p6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 May 2020 03:17:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 0457FLmV005872; Tue, 5 May 2020 07:17:53 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.17]) by ppma03wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30s0g6pubt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 May 2020 07:17:53 +0000 Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.236]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0457HqYG24903986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 May 2020 07:17:52 GMT Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7317DBE05A; Tue, 5 May 2020 07:17:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342ADBE04F; Tue, 5 May 2020 07:17:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skywalker.ibmuc.com (unknown [9.85.81.70]) by b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 May 2020 07:17:49 +0000 (GMT) From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au Subject: [PATCH v4 05/22] powerpc/book3s64/hash: Use the pte_t address from the caller Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 12:47:12 +0530 Message-Id: <20200505071729.54912-6-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200505071729.54912-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200505071729.54912-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-05_02:2020-05-04, 2020-05-05 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005050053 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , npiggin@gmail.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Don't fetch the pte value using lockless page table walk. Instead use the value from the caller. hash_preload is called with ptl lock held. So it is safe to use the pte_t address directly. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c | 27 +++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c index 525eac4ee2c2..3d727f73a8db 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c @@ -1546,14 +1546,11 @@ static bool should_hash_preload(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long ea) } #endif -static void hash_preload(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long ea, +static void hash_preload(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *ptep, unsigned long ea, bool is_exec, unsigned long trap) { - int hugepage_shift; unsigned long vsid; pgd_t *pgdir; - pte_t *ptep; - unsigned long flags; int rc, ssize, update_flags = 0; unsigned long access = _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_READ | (is_exec ? _PAGE_EXEC : 0); @@ -1575,30 +1572,18 @@ static void hash_preload(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long ea, vsid = get_user_vsid(&mm->context, ea, ssize); if (!vsid) return; - /* - * Hash doesn't like irqs. Walking linux page table with irq disabled - * saves us from holding multiple locks. - */ - local_irq_save(flags); - /* - * THP pages use update_mmu_cache_pmd. We don't do - * hash preload there. Hence can ignore THP here - */ - ptep = find_current_mm_pte(pgdir, ea, NULL, &hugepage_shift); - if (!ptep) - goto out_exit; - - WARN_ON(hugepage_shift); #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES /* If either H_PAGE_4K_PFN or cache inhibited is set (and we are on * a 64K kernel), then we don't preload, hash_page() will take * care of it once we actually try to access the page. * That way we don't have to duplicate all of the logic for segment * page size demotion here + * Called with PTL held, hence can be sure the value won't change in + * between. */ if ((pte_val(*ptep) & H_PAGE_4K_PFN) || pte_ci(*ptep)) - goto out_exit; + return; #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES */ /* Is that local to this CPU ? */ @@ -1623,8 +1608,6 @@ static void hash_preload(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long ea, mm_ctx_user_psize(&mm->context), mm_ctx_user_psize(&mm->context), pte_val(*ptep)); -out_exit: - local_irq_restore(flags); } /* @@ -1675,7 +1658,7 @@ void update_mmu_cache(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, return; } - hash_preload(vma->vm_mm, address, is_exec, trap); + hash_preload(vma->vm_mm, ptep, address, is_exec, trap); } #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM -- 2.26.2