From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D6AC47257 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 15:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (unknown [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED84C206B9 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 15:35:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ED84C206B9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49GkLx4DNVzDq5k for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 01:35:21 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net (client-ip=45.79.88.28; helo=ms.lwn.net; envelope-from=corbet@lwn.net; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49GkCc1jRkzDqf1 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 01:28:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0CF5737; Tue, 5 May 2020 15:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 09:28:38 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/29] Convert files to ReST - part 2 Message-ID: <20200505092838.4b1ff075@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20200428130128.22c4b973@lwn.net> References: <20200428130128.22c4b973@lwn.net> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:01:28 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > So I'm happy to merge this set, but there is one thing that worries me a > bit... > > > fs/cachefiles/Kconfig | 4 +- > > fs/coda/Kconfig | 2 +- > > fs/configfs/inode.c | 2 +- > > fs/configfs/item.c | 2 +- > > fs/fscache/Kconfig | 8 +- > > fs/fscache/cache.c | 8 +- > > fs/fscache/cookie.c | 2 +- > > fs/fscache/object.c | 4 +- > > fs/fscache/operation.c | 2 +- > > fs/locks.c | 2 +- > > include/linux/configfs.h | 2 +- > > include/linux/fs_context.h | 2 +- > > include/linux/fscache-cache.h | 4 +- > > include/linux/fscache.h | 42 +- > > include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 2 +- > > I'd feel a bit better if I could get an ack or two from filesystem folks > before I venture that far out of my own yard...what say you all? It's been another week and nobody has complained, so I'm taking that as assent; the series has been applied. Thanks, jon