From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C5EC47247 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F7F206A4 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Jpyx0GW/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 93F7F206A4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49Gl771slwzDqjQ for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 02:10:11 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=wsa@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Jpyx0GW/; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Gl0H4WGtzDqg6 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 02:04:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (p54B335A1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.179.53.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2BCE206A4; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:04:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588694653; bh=UPUCU3eUar7iY9cJbizcok3tqdxkqvfWgxtd4KniG9w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Jpyx0GW/MEFsaJ/3a8hJQAhv87YOfwuY2VCRaz2f23rAvywCCpVGpGI62SPlvU69i M6PyJEGWsX8kBfF4OIpUBzoH6UU6urADCJP1Lvy+RrPyzkDrdWg3+P38CzNeDwJ73w fcgb2+iKwsiUevl4QPm+FOQRnr/WwxiojXAm3VSs= Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 18:04:10 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/5200: update contact email Message-ID: <20200505160410.GH2468@ninjato> References: <20200502142642.18979-1-wsa@kernel.org> <877dxsdl5e.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v2Uk6McLiE8OV1El" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877dxsdl5e.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Paul Mackerras , kernel@pengutronix.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" --v2Uk6McLiE8OV1El Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > My 'pengutronix' address is defunct for years. Merge the entries and use > > the proper contact address. >=20 > Is there any point adding the new address? It's just likely to bit-rot > one day too. At least, this one is a group address, not an individual one, so less likey. > I figure the git history is a better source for more up-to-date emails. But yes, can still be argued. I won't persist if you don't like it. Thanks! --v2Uk6McLiE8OV1El Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAl6xjnoACgkQFA3kzBSg KbaTsxAAizU7yVpsyfvJAhLroyGpAVRj7LysT+H5JlZ8JjJ4uDpEhOhL4Hzr5QO4 T4RfB4o+1xmKc0pwT2BOUteCO05S2hRH6+cwel++k+vWjCnKUBxeinylK+ixk4+V P8QWDo/gFuqUtsm/Wb6PtBR8otMVa0FajdEPuaAkhi2OPQjO/2DvffSHT4c3VAtI HY4pIIbwaaCiAalCse6IrqkuJT90A0ZDM9oRTZOIaryVkkTHHkBNmB7PKu4viJic yS3yH+R0e5yBGEre6FkwL1z2CCNAGNXeBQ23gvq3glJAQIQyfBYgnO+lQFD8lZzq Cb8E69+sastbZnUBKAK7GR5xvBYJImCxN35PRakdd8/pLHcdKgwIWu1B9PTO5xQP avv3RmViYiSqfRJa5MSWqPu04zkJCYxy/w6yskdPHqhpG+7x1grsLO9hFBWxDN18 KDQaMtcgGzQbGzhxXnB8aZGJOEOTGrmlCxE35WQ5t3uGQe09hHTKuaUri288LXwH 7mK08jCqhMDavvLaUPngPz4IkdiAv8yZaK3LH4ikMQ4bKTJXhpnwfHYEswLP9FQq Qcrm3tGBksw5Ld3sncU+ENfhhVaoIyxWxxjTp+WQVI+jMjWGCuJ1hy57iPonXfKn 2LEqI9lEf2iukddWH32wj4eivgYf6UHnf91Y5FoePzMf197dID4= =bFLt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v2Uk6McLiE8OV1El--