From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE16C47254 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 20:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CB120757 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 20:37:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 55CB120757 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49Gs340n3KzDqkV for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 06:37:04 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk (client-ip=2002:c35c:fd02::1; helo=zeniv.linux.org.uk; envelope-from=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Gs0y1rcYzDqS6 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 06:35:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jW4H8-001jDE-Ib; Tue, 05 May 2020 20:34:46 +0000 Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 21:34:46 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: remove set_fs calls from the coredump code v6 Message-ID: <20200505203446.GZ23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20200505101256.3121270-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200505101256.3121270-1-hch@lst.de> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W . Biederman" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Jeremy Kerr Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:12:49PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > this series gets rid of playing with the address limit in the exec and > coredump code. Most of this was fairly trivial, the biggest changes are > those to the spufs coredump code. > > Changes since v5: > - fix uaccess under spinlock in spufs (Jeremy) > - remove use of access_ok in spufs > > Changes since v4: > - change some goto names as suggested by Linus > > Changes since v3: > - fix x86 compilation with x32 in the new version of the signal code > - split the exec patches into a new series > > Changes since v2: > - don't cleanup the compat siginfo calling conventions, use the patch > variant from Eric with slight coding style fixes instead. > > Changes since v1: > - properly spell NUL > - properly handle the compat siginfo case in ELF coredumps Looks good. Want me to put it into vfs.git? #work.set_fs-exec, perhaps?