From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0D8C28CBC for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 04:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB2120752 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 04:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="gK+DYdEa" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4EB2120752 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49H2xn6lZ0zDqxF for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:03:09 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::643; helo=mail-pl1-x643.google.com; envelope-from=jniethe5@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=gK+DYdEa; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x643.google.com (mail-pl1-x643.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::643]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49H2Xh6MrzzDqfZ for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 13:44:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pl1-x643.google.com with SMTP id s10so24103plr.1 for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 20:44:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=RZjLZ9ELNR3rGXOl29M1r3mt0qE92wKr7SZFNdXQ+NI=; b=gK+DYdEawY+KpH+JQQt1ar/aOQv58OwVffSTuBK1kh1xZm4KM3UxNmCs40B4O021R9 +CyN4iEQ8ZlsOKCyuCRIChTLs+YLIRpUcA00HschDDznIgstVfiRLHYLYvfxU7xyvmA0 xBuNXBJfuTVbuxai8YPyKs28fKKdA/L5lBgcJnOZO4P0CqrqEniA5N2Iw4laeB1fXFhy GZHhajT/3GYWmRAtWSUW96ASvbTBGY9khaSGAKPoM0WkmlL8pYcHWvqucqPJg6G/Wcw5 60kcTKw9SjnP09IdV4BHZgU6vAMVxFV/+b9t5Rs1Ud9If0XSufV0Fc9PLgSa63sRAFQM hFew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=RZjLZ9ELNR3rGXOl29M1r3mt0qE92wKr7SZFNdXQ+NI=; b=pq1syTr+iMSBnJc+Y9F6vWXfM1Cl3Q7dD2qWaIj9gevDo8pHT1YdUmgwlpNtlQc92S /3qsorCYgHtaEaDmtEM3Pk/mLnjPYs4bB2B/hc5Egn7rcLNkD/5LN2kh+3yTu4TjDj+R 5KTySV0LMOhF29yhgaoItpd7Mmfi28PEntkp+fI7Igkk0XC6clxfZDI/nwV15j1qob8b o9MH62dWbj26dv/5iYhxF+1tMJtLM+90oVC6Bc9PkRm+I0iLfTay6yMDCRwHS5DoL8jq uVlxAX7izi+f/AHeQ6i2Al29IGSRQlKiiSxAFYt/UlhFPkv6p8gwCP7DL1weRv6QXFtM g/ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubChDu82iT1t6+wAvK5h4MGXgoQnawOq9/q/dhDC26BQZd3su1I ptCCOklfCsgOzTlANLSU5SvSIKpikb3fag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJTHI/rCJOSEEyVvIJj4S2a27zXDMUpPg5Z5zrkneFaQ07vha1pYU5vHrTIzlVcCS9UTYhCBA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:33c5:: with SMTP id n63mr6647961pjb.4.1588736690457; Tue, 05 May 2020 20:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (180-150-65-4.b49641.syd.nbn.aussiebb.net. [180.150.65.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm465676pgg.88.2020.05.05.20.44.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 May 2020 20:44:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Jordan Niethe To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v8 10/30] powerpc: Introduce functions for instruction equality Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 13:40:30 +1000 Message-Id: <20200506034050.24806-11-jniethe5@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200506034050.24806-1-jniethe5@gmail.com> References: <20200506034050.24806-1-jniethe5@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alistair@popple.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, bala24@linux.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Jordan Niethe , dja@axtens.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" In preparation for an instruction data type that can not be directly used with the '==' operator use functions for checking equality. Reviewed-by: Balamuruhan S Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe --- v5: Remove ppc_inst_null() v7: Fix compilation issue in expected_nop_sequence() when no CONFIG_MPROFILE_KERNEL --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h | 5 +++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 15 ++++++++------- arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 12 ++++++------ arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h index 23fd57a86b03..0c5dc539160a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/inst.h @@ -23,4 +23,9 @@ static inline u32 ppc_inst_swab(u32 x) return ppc_inst(swab32(ppc_inst_val(x))); } +static inline bool ppc_inst_equal(u32 x, u32 y) +{ + return x == y; +} + #endif /* _ASM_INST_H */ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c index cc23c63f3769..cbb19af4a72a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long ip, unsigned int old, unsigned int new) return -EFAULT; /* Make sure it is what we expect it to be */ - if (replaced != old) { + if (!ppc_inst_equal(replaced, old)) { pr_err("%p: replaced (%#x) != old (%#x)", (void *)ip, ppc_inst_val(replaced), ppc_inst_val(old)); return -EINVAL; @@ -170,7 +170,8 @@ __ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod, } /* We expect either a mflr r0, or a std r0, LRSAVE(r1) */ - if (op != ppc_inst(PPC_INST_MFLR) && op != ppc_inst(PPC_INST_STD_LR)) { + if (!ppc_inst_equal(op, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_MFLR)) && + !ppc_inst_equal(op, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_STD_LR))) { pr_err("Unexpected instruction %08x around bl _mcount\n", ppc_inst_val(op)); return -EINVAL; @@ -201,7 +202,7 @@ __ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod, return -EFAULT; } - if (op != ppc_inst(PPC_INST_LD_TOC)) { + if (!ppc_inst_equal(op, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_LD_TOC))) { pr_err("Expected %08x found %08x\n", PPC_INST_LD_TOC, ppc_inst_val(op)); return -EINVAL; } @@ -498,7 +499,7 @@ expected_nop_sequence(void *ip, unsigned int op0, unsigned int op1) * The load offset is different depending on the ABI. For simplicity * just mask it out when doing the compare. */ - if (op0 != ppc_inst(0x48000008) || + if (!ppc_inst_equal(op0, ppc_inst(0x48000008)) || (ppc_inst_val(op1) & 0xffff0000) != 0xe8410000) return 0; return 1; @@ -508,7 +509,7 @@ static int expected_nop_sequence(void *ip, unsigned int op0, unsigned int op1) { /* look for patched "NOP" on ppc64 with -mprofile-kernel */ - if (op0 != ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP)) + if (!ppc_inst_equal(op0, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP))) return 0; return 1; } @@ -591,7 +592,7 @@ __ftrace_make_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr) return -EFAULT; /* It should be pointing to a nop */ - if (op != ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP)) { + if (!ppc_inst_equal(op, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP))) { pr_err("Expected NOP but have %x\n", ppc_inst_val(op)); return -EINVAL; } @@ -648,7 +649,7 @@ static int __ftrace_make_call_kernel(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long addr) return -EFAULT; } - if (op != ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP)) { + if (!ppc_inst_equal(op, ppc_inst(PPC_INST_NOP))) { pr_err("Unexpected call sequence at %p: %x\n", ip, ppc_inst_val(op)); return -EINVAL; } diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c index f5c6dcbac44b..d298bb16936e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static void __init test_branch_iform(void) /* Check flags are masked correctly */ err = create_branch(&instr, &instr, addr, 0xFFFFFFFC); check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr)); - check(instr == ppc_inst(0x48000000)); + check(ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst(0x48000000))); } static void __init test_create_function_call(void) @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static void __init test_branch_bform(void) /* Check flags are masked correctly */ err = create_cond_branch(&instr, iptr, addr, 0xFFFFFFFC); check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(&instr, addr)); - check(instr == ppc_inst(0x43FF0000)); + check(ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst(0x43FF0000))); } static void __init test_translate_branch(void) @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static void __init test_translate_branch(void) patch_instruction(q, instr); check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(p, addr)); check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(q, addr)); - check(*q == ppc_inst(0x4a000000)); + check(ppc_inst_equal(*q, ppc_inst(0x4a000000))); /* Maximum positive case, move x to x - 32 MB + 4 */ p = buf + 0x2000000; @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static void __init test_translate_branch(void) patch_instruction(q, instr); check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(p, addr)); check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(q, addr)); - check(*q == ppc_inst(0x49fffffc)); + check(ppc_inst_equal(*q, ppc_inst(0x49fffffc))); /* Jump to x + 16 MB moved to x + 20 MB */ p = buf; @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static void __init test_translate_branch(void) patch_instruction(q, instr); check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(p, addr)); check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(q, addr)); - check(*q == ppc_inst(0x43ff8000)); + check(ppc_inst_equal(*q, ppc_inst(0x43ff8000))); /* Maximum positive case, move x to x - 32 KB + 4 */ p = buf + 0x8000; @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static void __init test_translate_branch(void) patch_instruction(q, instr); check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(p, addr)); check(instr_is_branch_to_addr(q, addr)); - check(*q == ppc_inst(0x43ff7ffc)); + check(ppc_inst_equal(*q, ppc_inst(0x43ff7ffc))); /* Jump to x + 12 KB moved to x + 20 KB */ p = buf; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c index 99ba585a769b..2e8ed8cdcf28 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c @@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static void remove_bpts(void) if ((bp->enabled & (BP_TRAP|BP_CIABR)) != BP_TRAP) continue; if (mread(bp->address, &instr, 4) == 4 - && instr == ppc_inst(bpinstr) + && ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst(bpinstr)) && patch_instruction( (unsigned int *)bp->address, bp->instr[0]) != 0) printf("Couldn't remove breakpoint at %lx\n", @@ -2862,7 +2862,7 @@ generic_inst_dump(unsigned long adr, long count, int praddr, break; } inst = ppc_inst(GETWORD(val)); - if (adr > first_adr && inst == last_inst) { + if (adr > first_adr && ppc_inst_equal(inst, last_inst)) { if (!dotted) { printf(" ...\n"); dotted = 1; -- 2.17.1