From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/16] powerpc/pseries: machine check use rtas_call_unlocked with args on stack
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 14:34:02 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200508043408.886394-11-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200508043408.886394-1-npiggin@gmail.com>
With the previous patch, machine checks can use rtas_call_unlocked
which avoids the rtas spinlock which would deadlock if a machine
check hits while making an rtas call.
This also avoids the complex rtas error logging which has more rtas calls
and includes kmalloc (which can return memory beyond RMA, which would
also crash).
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c
index b2adba59f0ff..ce1665e58d9b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c
@@ -468,7 +468,15 @@ static struct rtas_error_log *fwnmi_get_errinfo(struct pt_regs *regs)
*/
static void fwnmi_release_errinfo(void)
{
- int ret = rtas_call(ibm_nmi_interlock_token, 0, 1, NULL);
+ struct rtas_args rtas_args;
+ int ret;
+
+ /*
+ * On pseries, the machine check stack is limited to under 4GB, so
+ * args can be on-stack.
+ */
+ rtas_call_unlocked(&rtas_args, ibm_nmi_interlock_token, 0, 1, NULL);
+ ret = be32_to_cpu(rtas_args.rets[0]);
if (ret != 0)
printk(KERN_ERR "FWNMI: nmi-interlock failed: %d\n", ret);
}
--
2.23.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-08 4:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-08 4:33 [PATCH v4 00/16] powerpc: machine check and system reset fixes Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:33 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] powerpc/64s/exception: Fix machine check no-loss idle wakeup Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:33 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] powerpc/64s/exceptions: Fix in_mce accounting in unrecoverable path Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:33 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] powerpc/64s/exceptions: Change irq reconcile for NMIs from reusing _DAR to RESULT Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:33 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] powerpc/64s/exceptions: machine check reconcile irq state Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 13:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-05-09 7:48 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:33 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] powerpc/pseries/ras: avoid calling rtas_token in NMI paths Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:33 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] powerpc/pseries/ras: FWNMI_VALID off by one Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:33 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] powerpc/pseries/ras: fwnmi avoid modifying r3 in error case Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] powerpc/pseries/ras: fwnmi sreset should not interlock Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] powerpc/pseries: limit machine check stack to 4GB Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:34 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2020-05-08 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] powerpc/64s: machine check interrupt update NMI accounting Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-09 3:13 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-09 7:50 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-11 9:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-05-08 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] powerpc: implement ftrace_enabled helper Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] powerpc/64s: machine check do not trace real-mode handler Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] powerpc/traps: system reset do not trace Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] powerpc/traps: make unrecoverable NMIs die instead of panic Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-08 4:34 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] powerpc/traps: Machine check fix RI=0 recoverability check Nicholas Piggin
2020-05-20 11:00 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] powerpc: machine check and system reset fixes Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200508043408.886394-11-npiggin@gmail.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).