From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A26DC54E4A for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C6C6206D3 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:37:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3C6C6206D3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49LzPS5VmWzDqg6 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:37:16 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49LzF64rCYzDqVL for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:30:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04CD4Z9e011292; Tue, 12 May 2020 09:29:52 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30yv20sc3n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 May 2020 09:29:52 -0400 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 04CD5jiM013817; Tue, 12 May 2020 09:29:51 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30yv20sc2t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 May 2020 09:29:51 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 04CDL5BG026750; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:49 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30wm55ejmb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:49 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 04CDTlIX66125906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:47 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3A44203F; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29EB4204C; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srikart450.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.199.47.102]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:43 +0000 (GMT) From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Andrew Morton Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] powerpc/numa: Set numa_node for all possible cpus Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:59:35 +0530 Message-Id: <20200512132937.19295-2-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200512132937.19295-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20200512132937.19295-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-12_03:2020-05-11, 2020-05-12 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005120094 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Gautham R Shenoy , Michal Hocko , Srikar Dronamraju , David Hildenbrand , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Satheesh Rajendran , Mel Gorman , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Christopher Lameter , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Vlastimil Babka Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" A Powerpc system with multiple possible nodes and with CONFIG_NUMA enabled always used to have a node 0, even if node 0 does not any cpus or memory attached to it. As per PAPR, node affinity of a cpu is only available once its present / online. For all cpus that are possible but not present, cpu_to_node() would point to node 0. To ensure a cpuless, memoryless dummy node is not online, powerpc need to make sure all possible but not present cpu_to_node are set to a proper node. Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Christopher Lameter Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Gautham R Shenoy Cc: Satheesh Rajendran Cc: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju --- Changelog v3:->v4: - Resolved comments from Christopher. Link v3: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200501031128.19584-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com/t/#u Changelog v1:->v2: - Rebased to v5.7-rc3 arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c index 9fcf2d1..5b7918c 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c @@ -506,6 +506,11 @@ static int numa_setup_cpu(unsigned long lcpu) int fcpu = cpu_first_thread_sibling(lcpu); int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE; + if (!cpu_present(lcpu)) { + set_cpu_numa_node(lcpu, first_online_node); + return first_online_node; + } + /* * If a valid cpu-to-node mapping is already available, use it * directly instead of querying the firmware, since it represents @@ -931,8 +936,17 @@ void __init mem_topology_setup(void) reset_numa_cpu_lookup_table(); - for_each_present_cpu(cpu) + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + /* + * Powerpc with CONFIG_NUMA always used to have a node 0, + * even if it was memoryless or cpuless. For all cpus that + * are possible but not present, cpu_to_node() would point + * to node 0. To remove a cpuless, memoryless dummy node, + * powerpc need to make sure all possible but not present + * cpu_to_node are set to a proper node. + */ numa_setup_cpu(cpu); + } } void __init initmem_init(void) -- 1.8.3.1