From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17F6C433E0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EE3A20657 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:15:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8EE3A20657 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49RQZY0fM0zDqw8 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:15:33 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49RQGp07RMzDqCR for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:01:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04JIXUXq142820; Tue, 19 May 2020 15:01:17 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 312bg7kgcx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 May 2020 15:01:17 -0400 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 04JIXVk5142941; Tue, 19 May 2020 15:01:17 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 312bg7kgbh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 May 2020 15:01:16 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04JJ0aoT004655; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:01:13 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 313xehj6bs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 May 2020 19:01:13 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 04JJ1AxA65012106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 19 May 2020 19:01:10 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8232A11C050; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:01:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E3C11C04A; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:01:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vajain21-in-ibm-com (unknown [9.85.89.230]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Tue, 19 May 2020 19:01:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: by vajain21-in-ibm-com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 20 May 2020 00:31:06 +0530 From: Vaibhav Jain To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RESEND PATCH v7 1/5] powerpc: Document details on H_SCM_HEALTH hcall Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 00:30:54 +0530 Message-Id: <20200519190058.257981-2-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200519190058.257981-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200519190058.257981-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-19_07:2020-05-19, 2020-05-19 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005190157 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Santosh Sivaraj , Steven Rostedt , Oliver O'Halloran , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Vaibhav Jain , Dan Williams Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Add documentation to 'papr_hcalls.rst' describing the bitmap flags that are returned from H_SCM_HEALTH hcall as per the PAPR-SCM specification. Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain --- Changelog: Resend: * None v6..v7: * None v5..v6 * New patch in the series --- Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst b/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst index 3493631a60f8..9a5ba5eaf323 100644 --- a/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst +++ b/Documentation/powerpc/papr_hcalls.rst @@ -220,13 +220,48 @@ from the LPAR memory. **H_SCM_HEALTH** | Input: drcIndex -| Out: *health-bitmap, health-bit-valid-bitmap* +| Out: *health-bitmap (r4), health-bit-valid-bitmap (r5)* | Return Value: *H_Success, H_Parameter, H_Hardware* Given a DRC Index return the info on predictive failure and overall health of -the NVDIMM. The asserted bits in the health-bitmap indicate a single predictive -failure and health-bit-valid-bitmap indicate which bits in health-bitmap are -valid. +the NVDIMM. The asserted bits in the health-bitmap indicate one or more states +(described in table below) of the NVDIMM and health-bit-valid-bitmap indicate +which bits in health-bitmap are valid. + +Health Bitmap Flags: + ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| Bit | Definition | ++======+=======================================================================+ +| 00 | SCM device is unable to persist memory contents. | +| | If the system is powered down, nothing will be saved. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 01 | SCM device failed to persist memory contents. Either contents were not| +| | saved successfully on power down or were not restored properly on | +| | power up. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 02 | SCM device contents are persisted from previous IPL. The data from | +| | the last boot were successfully restored. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 03 | SCM device contents are not persisted from previous IPL. There was no | +| | data to restore from the last boot. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 04 | SCM device memory life remaining is critically low | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 05 | SCM device will be garded off next IPL due to failure | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 06 | SCM contents cannot persist due to current platform health status. A | +| | hardware failure may prevent data from being saved or restored. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 07 | SCM device is unable to persist memory contents in certain conditions | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 08 | SCM device is encrypted | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| 09 | SCM device has successfully completed a requested erase or secure | +| | erase procedure. | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ +|10:63 | Reserved / Unused | ++------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ **H_SCM_PERFORMANCE_STATS** -- 2.26.2