From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD18C433DF for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 016D9206DD for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:47:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 016D9206DD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49Vv190BkczDqCZ for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 20:47:09 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=kjain@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Vtx44NmtzDqPw for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 20:43:36 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04PAcGXm049978; Mon, 25 May 2020 06:43:26 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 318ajs3529-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 May 2020 06:43:26 -0400 Received: from m0098420.ppops.net (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 04PAcYK4051044; Mon, 25 May 2020 06:43:26 -0400 Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 318ajs351k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 May 2020 06:43:25 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04PAfhvt015451; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:43:24 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 316uf8hjv3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 May 2020 10:43:23 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 04PAhLDP34668752 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 25 May 2020 10:43:21 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE8311C058; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:43:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C905211C050; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:43:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [9.199.38.13]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:43:16 +0000 (GMT) From: Kajol Jain To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, suka@us.ibm.com, nathanl@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v10 1/5] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Fix inconsistent output values incase multiple hv-24x7 events run Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 16:13:03 +0530 Message-Id: <20200525104308.9814-2-kjain@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.3 In-Reply-To: <20200525104308.9814-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200525104308.9814-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-25_04:2020-05-25, 2020-05-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005250077 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mpetlan@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mamatha4@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Madhavan Srinivasan , jmario@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, Sukadev Bhattiprolu Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Commit 2b206ee6b0df ("powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Display change in counter values")' added to print _change_ in the counter value rather then raw value for 24x7 counters. Incase of transactions, the event count is set to 0 at the beginning of the transaction. It also sets the event's prev_count to the raw value at the time of initialization. Because of setting event count to 0, we are seeing some weird behaviour, whenever we run multiple 24x7 events at a time. For example: command#: ./perf stat -e "{hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/, hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/}" -C 0 -I 1000 sleep 100 1.000121704 120 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 1.000121704 5 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 2.000357733 8 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 2.000357733 10 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 3.000495215 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 3.000495215 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 4.000641884 56 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 4.000641884 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 5.000791887 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ Getting these large values in case we do -I. As we are setting event_count to 0, for interval case, overall event_count is not coming in incremental order. As we may can get new delta lesser then previous count. Because of which when we print intervals, we are getting negative value which create these large values. This patch removes part where we set event_count to 0 in function 'h_24x7_event_read'. There won't be much impact as we do set event->hw.prev_count to the raw value at the time of initialization to print change value. With this patch In power9 platform command#: ./perf stat -e "{hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/, hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/}" -C 0 -I 1000 sleep 100 1.000117685 93 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 1.000117685 1 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 2.000349331 98 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 2.000349331 2 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 3.000495900 131 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 3.000495900 4 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 4.000645920 204 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ 4.000645920 61 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=1/ 4.284169997 22 hv_24x7/PM_MCS01_128B_RD_DISP_PORT01,chip=0/ Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain Suggested-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Tested-by: Madhavan Srinivasan --- arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | 10 ---------- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c index 573e0b309c0c..48e8f4b17b91 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c @@ -1400,16 +1400,6 @@ static void h_24x7_event_read(struct perf_event *event) h24x7hw = &get_cpu_var(hv_24x7_hw); h24x7hw->events[i] = event; put_cpu_var(h24x7hw); - /* - * Clear the event count so we can compute the _change_ - * in the 24x7 raw counter value at the end of the txn. - * - * Note that we could alternatively read the 24x7 value - * now and save its value in event->hw.prev_count. But - * that would require issuing a hcall, which would then - * defeat the purpose of using the txn interface. - */ - local64_set(&event->count, 0); } put_cpu_var(hv_24x7_reqb); -- 2.18.2