From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1542C433DF for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F8CA2067B for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R+x3Nw9u" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4F8CA2067B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ch9M3tnkzDqdv for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 06:59:19 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux-foundation.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=akpm@linux-foundation.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=R+x3Nw9u; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49ch7T0W7RzDqd7 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 06:57:40 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41A652067B; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591217858; bh=SA51jkVVsXD1P0/zuGau7LRvGwUl3rZwCvD7U14lHT0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R+x3Nw9u+7nEi0n9itYHOzSOxlNljPSeK///Mzs4PX4z9nuno+Auj7Ou/r8TfYcQj uztZdVJR2O9plQuWNmfFkbrIVuKApSrGtnDYKJxw1kdVo7XgNWC760pouhfMKv0YAR x/btwctWzOGNMZ8iDeLFOfWGWVXq4qA+zZh+kfGg= Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:57:36 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ira Weiny Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable pagefault/preempt twice Message-Id: <20200603135736.e7b5ded0082a81ae6d9067a0@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20200507150004.1423069-8-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200518184843.3029640-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20200519165422.GA5838@roeck-us.net> <20200519184031.GB3356843@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200519194215.GA71941@roeck-us.net> <20200520051315.GA3660833@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <20200521174250.GB176262@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Max Filippov , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Helge Deller , x86@kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Guenter Roeck , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Borislav Petkov , Al Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chris Zankel , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Koenig , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny wrote: > > > > > > Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for > > > sparc 32 bit... > > > > > > Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch? > > > > > > 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions > > > > > > > That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up patches. > > I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass... > > 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh > Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f > > Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed > > Is there another test I need to run? This all petered out, but as I understand it, this patchset still might have issues on various architectures. Can folks please provide an update on the testing status?