From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AB7C433DF for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE2E207C3 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:16:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BEE2E207C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49h2yZ3922zDqVF for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:16:38 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=harish@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49h2wd09n4zDqTC for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 18:14:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05982Qi6032117; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 04:14:50 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31j4umurn8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 04:14:50 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05986uD8002113; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:14:48 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 31g2s7wh30-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 08:14:48 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0598EjiN12059068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:14:46 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB5D4204C; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:14:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A272242047; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:14:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [9.79.190.223]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:14:43 +0000 (GMT) From: Harish To: mpe@ellerman.id.au Subject: [PATCH v3] selftests: powerpc: Fix CPU affinity for child process Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:44:23 +0530 Message-Id: <20200609081423.529664-1-harish@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-09_02:2020-06-08, 2020-06-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006090056 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, shiganta@in.ibm.com, sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sandipan@linux.ibm.com, Harish , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On systems with large number of cpus, test fails trying to set affinity by calling sched_setaffinity() with smaller size for affinity mask. This patch fixes it by making sure that the size of allocated affinity mask is dependent on the number of CPUs as reported by get_nprocs(). Fixes: 00b7ec5c9cf3 ("selftests/powerpc: Import Anton's context_switch2 benchmark") Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das Signed-off-by: Harish --- v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200609034005.520137-1-harish@linux.ibm.com/ Changes from v2: - Interchanged size and ncpus as suggested by Satheesh - Revert the exit code as suggested by Satheesh - Added NULL check for the affinity mask as suggested by Kamalesh - Freed the affinity mask allocation after affinity is set as suggested by Kamalesh - Changed "cpu set" to "affinity mask" in the commit message --- .../powerpc/benchmarks/context_switch.c | 21 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/context_switch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/context_switch.c index a2e8c9da7fa5..d50cc05df495 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/context_switch.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/benchmarks/context_switch.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -104,8 +105,9 @@ static void start_thread_on(void *(*fn)(void *), void *arg, unsigned long cpu) static void start_process_on(void *(*fn)(void *), void *arg, unsigned long cpu) { - int pid; - cpu_set_t cpuset; + int pid, ncpus; + cpu_set_t *cpuset; + size_t size; pid = fork(); if (pid == -1) { @@ -116,14 +118,23 @@ static void start_process_on(void *(*fn)(void *), void *arg, unsigned long cpu) if (pid) return; - CPU_ZERO(&cpuset); - CPU_SET(cpu, &cpuset); + ncpus = get_nprocs(); + size = CPU_ALLOC_SIZE(ncpus); + cpuset = CPU_ALLOC(ncpus); + if (!cpuset) { + perror("malloc"); + exit(1); + } + CPU_ZERO_S(size, cpuset); + CPU_SET_S(cpu, size, cpuset); - if (sched_setaffinity(0, sizeof(cpuset), &cpuset)) { + if (sched_setaffinity(0, size, cpuset)) { perror("sched_setaffinity"); + CPU_FREE(cpuset); exit(1); } + CPU_FREE(cpuset); fn(arg); exit(0); -- 2.24.1