From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F5FC433DF for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65C8320656 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:37:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 65C8320656 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49hk2J5sF5zDqlR for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 20:37:12 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49hj3j5phPzDqY4 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:53:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05A9WjOj049372; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:53:18 -0400 Received: from ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (1a.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.26]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31jgu5vqxf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:53:17 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05A9jpOn009850; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:53:16 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.27]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 31hdb3mx2m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:53:16 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 05A9rGbP31064420 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:53:16 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDF3112065; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:53:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1E4112063; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:53:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skywalker.ibmuc.com (unknown [9.79.180.2]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:53:13 +0000 (GMT) From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au Subject: [PATCH v3 23/41] powerpc/exec: Set thread.regs early during exec Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:21:46 +0530 Message-Id: <20200610095204.608183-24-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200610095204.608183-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200610095204.608183-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-10_06:2020-06-10, 2020-06-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006100073 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linuxram@us.ibm.com, bauerman@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" In later patches during exec, we would like to access default regs.kuap to control access to the user mapping. Having thread.regs set early makes the code changes simpler. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h | 2 -- arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h index ca6c97025704..9418dff1cfe1 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h @@ -77,10 +77,8 @@ struct thread_info { /* how to get the thread information struct from C */ extern int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src); -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 void arch_setup_new_exec(void); #define arch_setup_new_exec arch_setup_new_exec -#endif #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c index 048d64c4e115..14599c7e4a37 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c @@ -1473,10 +1473,32 @@ void flush_thread(void) #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 void arch_setup_new_exec(void) { - if (radix_enabled()) - return; - hash__setup_new_exec(); + if (!radix_enabled()) + hash__setup_new_exec(); + + /* + * If we exec out of a kernel thread then thread.regs will not be + * set. Do it now. + */ + if (!current->thread.regs) { + struct pt_regs *regs = task_stack_page(current) + THREAD_SIZE; + current->thread.regs = regs - 1; + } + } +#else +void arch_setup_new_exec(void) +{ + /* + * If we exec out of a kernel thread then thread.regs will not be + * set. Do it now. + */ + if (!current->thread.regs) { + struct pt_regs *regs = task_stack_page(current) + THREAD_SIZE; + current->thread.regs = regs - 1; + } +} + #endif #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 @@ -1704,15 +1726,6 @@ void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long start, unsigned long sp) #endif #endif - /* - * If we exec out of a kernel thread then thread.regs will not be - * set. Do it now. - */ - if (!current->thread.regs) { - struct pt_regs *regs = task_stack_page(current) + THREAD_SIZE; - current->thread.regs = regs - 1; - } - #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM /* * Clear any transactional state, we're exec()ing. The cause is -- 2.26.2