linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: tyreld@linux.ibm.com, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
	svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 09/18] powerpc/numa: stub out numa_update_cpu_topology()
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:12:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200612051238.1007764-10-nathanl@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200612051238.1007764-1-nathanl@linux.ibm.com>

Previous changes have removed the code which sets bits in
cpu_associativity_changes_mask and thus it is never modifed at
runtime. From this we can reason that numa_update_cpu_topology()
always returns 0 without doing anything. Remove the body of
numa_update_cpu_topology() and remove all code which becomes
unreachable as a result.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 193 +----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 192 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
index 8749d7f2b1a6..b220e5b60140 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -1122,14 +1122,6 @@ u64 memory_hotplug_max(void)
 
 /* Virtual Processor Home Node (VPHN) support */
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR
-struct topology_update_data {
-	struct topology_update_data *next;
-	unsigned int cpu;
-	int old_nid;
-	int new_nid;
-};
-
-static cpumask_t cpu_associativity_changes_mask;
 static int topology_inited;
 
 /*
@@ -1219,192 +1211,9 @@ int find_and_online_cpu_nid(int cpu)
 	return new_nid;
 }
 
-/*
- * Update the CPU maps and sysfs entries for a single CPU when its NUMA
- * characteristics change. This function doesn't perform any locking and is
- * only safe to call from stop_machine().
- */
-static int update_cpu_topology(void *data)
-{
-	struct topology_update_data *update;
-	unsigned long cpu;
-
-	if (!data)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
-	for (update = data; update; update = update->next) {
-		int new_nid = update->new_nid;
-		if (cpu != update->cpu)
-			continue;
-
-		unmap_cpu_from_node(cpu);
-		map_cpu_to_node(cpu, new_nid);
-		set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, new_nid);
-		set_cpu_numa_mem(cpu, local_memory_node(new_nid));
-		vdso_getcpu_init();
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int update_lookup_table(void *data)
-{
-	struct topology_update_data *update;
-
-	if (!data)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	/*
-	 * Upon topology update, the numa-cpu lookup table needs to be updated
-	 * for all threads in the core, including offline CPUs, to ensure that
-	 * future hotplug operations respect the cpu-to-node associativity
-	 * properly.
-	 */
-	for (update = data; update; update = update->next) {
-		int nid, base, j;
-
-		nid = update->new_nid;
-		base = cpu_first_thread_sibling(update->cpu);
-
-		for (j = 0; j < threads_per_core; j++) {
-			update_numa_cpu_lookup_table(base + j, nid);
-		}
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * Update the node maps and sysfs entries for each cpu whose home node
- * has changed. Returns 1 when the topology has changed, and 0 otherwise.
- *
- * cpus_locked says whether we already hold cpu_hotplug_lock.
- */
 int numa_update_cpu_topology(bool cpus_locked)
 {
-	unsigned int cpu, sibling, changed = 0;
-	struct topology_update_data *updates, *ud;
-	cpumask_t updated_cpus;
-	struct device *dev;
-	int weight, new_nid, i = 0;
-
-	if (topology_inited)
-		return 0;
-
-	weight = cpumask_weight(&cpu_associativity_changes_mask);
-	if (!weight)
-		return 0;
-
-	updates = kcalloc(weight, sizeof(*updates), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!updates)
-		return 0;
-
-	cpumask_clear(&updated_cpus);
-
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpu_associativity_changes_mask) {
-		/*
-		 * If siblings aren't flagged for changes, updates list
-		 * will be too short. Skip on this update and set for next
-		 * update.
-		 */
-		if (!cpumask_subset(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu),
-					&cpu_associativity_changes_mask)) {
-			pr_info("Sibling bits not set for associativity "
-					"change, cpu%d\n", cpu);
-			cpumask_or(&cpu_associativity_changes_mask,
-					&cpu_associativity_changes_mask,
-					cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
-			cpu = cpu_last_thread_sibling(cpu);
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		new_nid = find_and_online_cpu_nid(cpu);
-
-		if (new_nid == numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu]) {
-			cpumask_andnot(&cpu_associativity_changes_mask,
-					&cpu_associativity_changes_mask,
-					cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
-			dbg("Assoc chg gives same node %d for cpu%d\n",
-					new_nid, cpu);
-			cpu = cpu_last_thread_sibling(cpu);
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)) {
-			ud = &updates[i++];
-			ud->next = &updates[i];
-			ud->cpu = sibling;
-			ud->new_nid = new_nid;
-			ud->old_nid = numa_cpu_lookup_table[sibling];
-			cpumask_set_cpu(sibling, &updated_cpus);
-		}
-		cpu = cpu_last_thread_sibling(cpu);
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Prevent processing of 'updates' from overflowing array
-	 * where last entry filled in a 'next' pointer.
-	 */
-	if (i)
-		updates[i-1].next = NULL;
-
-	pr_debug("Topology update for the following CPUs:\n");
-	if (cpumask_weight(&updated_cpus)) {
-		for (ud = &updates[0]; ud; ud = ud->next) {
-			pr_debug("cpu %d moving from node %d "
-					  "to %d\n", ud->cpu,
-					  ud->old_nid, ud->new_nid);
-		}
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * In cases where we have nothing to update (because the updates list
-	 * is too short or because the new topology is same as the old one),
-	 * skip invoking update_cpu_topology() via stop-machine(). This is
-	 * necessary (and not just a fast-path optimization) since stop-machine
-	 * can end up electing a random CPU to run update_cpu_topology(), and
-	 * thus trick us into setting up incorrect cpu-node mappings (since
-	 * 'updates' is kzalloc()'ed).
-	 *
-	 * And for the similar reason, we will skip all the following updating.
-	 */
-	if (!cpumask_weight(&updated_cpus))
-		goto out;
-
-	if (cpus_locked)
-		stop_machine_cpuslocked(update_cpu_topology, &updates[0],
-					&updated_cpus);
-	else
-		stop_machine(update_cpu_topology, &updates[0], &updated_cpus);
-
-	/*
-	 * Update the numa-cpu lookup table with the new mappings, even for
-	 * offline CPUs. It is best to perform this update from the stop-
-	 * machine context.
-	 */
-	if (cpus_locked)
-		stop_machine_cpuslocked(update_lookup_table, &updates[0],
-					cpumask_of(raw_smp_processor_id()));
-	else
-		stop_machine(update_lookup_table, &updates[0],
-			     cpumask_of(raw_smp_processor_id()));
-
-	for (ud = &updates[0]; ud; ud = ud->next) {
-		unregister_cpu_under_node(ud->cpu, ud->old_nid);
-		register_cpu_under_node(ud->cpu, ud->new_nid);
-
-		dev = get_cpu_device(ud->cpu);
-		if (dev)
-			kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
-		cpumask_clear_cpu(ud->cpu, &cpu_associativity_changes_mask);
-		changed = 1;
-	}
-
-out:
-	kfree(updates);
-	return changed;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 int arch_update_cpu_topology(void)
-- 
2.25.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-12  5:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-12  5:12 [PATCH 00/18] remove extended cede offline mode and bogus topology update code Nathan Lynch
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 01/18] powerpc/pseries: remove cede offline state for CPUs Nathan Lynch
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 02/18] powerpc/rtas: don't online CPUs for partition suspend Nathan Lynch
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 03/18] powerpc/numa: remove ability to enable topology updates Nathan Lynch
2020-06-23 16:23   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 04/18] powerpc/numa: remove unreachable topology update code Nathan Lynch
2020-06-23 16:24   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 05/18] powerpc/numa: make vphn_enabled, prrn_enabled flags const Nathan Lynch
2020-06-23 16:24   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 06/18] powerpc/numa: remove unreachable topology timer code Nathan Lynch
2020-06-23 16:25   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 07/18] powerpc/numa: remove unreachable topology workqueue code Nathan Lynch
2020-06-23 16:26   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 08/18] powerpc/numa: remove vphn_enabled and prrn_enabled internal flags Nathan Lynch
2020-06-23 16:27   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2020-06-23 16:27   ` [PATCH 09/18] powerpc/numa: stub out numa_update_cpu_topology() Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 10/18] powerpc/numa: remove timed_topology_update() Nathan Lynch
2020-06-23 16:28   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 11/18] powerpc/numa: remove start/stop_topology_update() Nathan Lynch
2020-06-23 16:28   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 12/18] powerpc/rtasd: simplify handle_rtas_event(), emit message on events Nathan Lynch
2020-06-23 16:30   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 13/18] powerpc/numa: remove prrn_is_enabled() Nathan Lynch
2020-06-23 16:31   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 14/18] powerpc/numa: remove arch_update_cpu_topology Nathan Lynch
2020-06-23 16:32   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 15/18] powerpc/pseries: remove prrn special case from DT update path Nathan Lynch
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 16/18] powerpc/pseries: remove memory "re-add" implementation Nathan Lynch
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 17/18] powerpc/pseries: remove dlpar_cpu_readd() Nathan Lynch
2020-06-12  5:12 ` [PATCH 18/18] powerpc/pseries: remove obsolete memory hotplug DT notifier code Nathan Lynch
2020-07-16 12:56 ` [PATCH 00/18] remove extended cede offline mode and bogus topology update code Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200612051238.1007764-10-nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).