From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73932C433DF for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 02:07:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB2982071A for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 02:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="JS2td1FL"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="JS2td1FL" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CB2982071A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49mBRj42nJzDqXm for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:07:45 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=207.211.31.120; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com; envelope-from=longman@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=JS2td1FL; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=JS2td1FL; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49mBF73TlWzDqR2 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:58:35 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1592272712; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zNT9QNZqNhCOtvB39Ne/de/mYb4LuwliJqmp3BjLDNM=; b=JS2td1FL3iaJ2EyG/W1FlTnqeDrJBf59tfvpmWVeuyX0N8nhxmhE+54fpekMiHWHilNW3/ LCwl5OXkR8Tzbyrx7wuZtlrNuntAdayyfUQnDWj3/+0IdvmqEVYmcuLoEdVz5YxXhXojTJ zaFXFL9acC9v1ZpgS3UeLQoEMrx4Px8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1592272712; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zNT9QNZqNhCOtvB39Ne/de/mYb4LuwliJqmp3BjLDNM=; b=JS2td1FL3iaJ2EyG/W1FlTnqeDrJBf59tfvpmWVeuyX0N8nhxmhE+54fpekMiHWHilNW3/ LCwl5OXkR8Tzbyrx7wuZtlrNuntAdayyfUQnDWj3/+0IdvmqEVYmcuLoEdVz5YxXhXojTJ zaFXFL9acC9v1ZpgS3UeLQoEMrx4Px8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-275-En0zXgVSO2KfRECG05UTtA-1; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 21:58:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: En0zXgVSO2KfRECG05UTtA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55EBE8035CF; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 01:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llong.com (ovpn-117-41.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.117.41]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E4F6ED96; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 01:58:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Waiman Long To: Andrew Morton , David Howells , Jarkko Sakkinen , James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Linus Torvalds , Joe Perches , Matthew Wilcox , David Rientjes Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] btrfs: Use kfree() in btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_info() Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 21:57:18 -0400 Message-Id: <20200616015718.7812-4-longman@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200616015718.7812-1-longman@redhat.com> References: <20200616015718.7812-1-longman@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" , Michal Hocko , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long , Dan Carpenter , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" In btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_info(), there is a classic case where kzalloc() was incorrectly paired with kzfree(). According to David Sterba, there isn't any sensitive information in the subvol_info that needs to be cleared before freeing. So kfree_sensitive() isn't really needed, use kfree() instead. Reported-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Waiman Long --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index f1dd9e4271e9..e8f7c5f00894 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -2692,7 +2692,7 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_info(struct file *file, void __user *argp) btrfs_put_root(root); out_free: btrfs_free_path(path); - kfree_sensitive(subvol_info); + kfree(subvol_info); return ret; } -- 2.18.1