From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54A6C433E0 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F562098B for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="IQBU2NQm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 38F562098B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49n46q6tvYzDqvY for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:26:11 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:e::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=willy@infradead.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20170209 header.b=IQBU2NQm; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49n43q6rQNzDqsC for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:23:35 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=kuxQjzZYMs0tFNd2RWRJXl84IRXkLYtgdsZsfAqzUYg=; b=IQBU2NQmYfbU9KEVYJFVsVFYt3 +7GWl3H6cqgUcZ3+um4sERSLuBbzrv7jNZkdM2ZwoSGps038Nt8YY6ApW7PCwZCMfBc10Gz0GDyzO FLEfO9i0HAYVGksHFDKWFRCvjngG1ecDhElpGpw4HbCuIF3Vgh8+lquymjHTFre2rQkZtiIdou22y K/Aznp4o73iZczN2ksz99zOnq95b5QaAhubthCZzggr2DMMUwYzN2WxAT6vZxmfMDafnFj+QcCY/1 +vXnWv1CMw2nHqOvDrXxSQKys1aoXcvwws0qgcZ/d+QvYDKvCoK1AjvkCvq5Nft1Yp25qyw3Vw/EI 56Yd0PTA==; Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jlX69-0005Xm-3Z; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:23:21 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 05:23:21 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() Message-ID: <20200617122321.GJ8681@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20200616015718.7812-1-longman@redhat.com> <20200616230130.GJ27795@twin.jikos.cz> <20200617003711.GD8681@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200617071212.GJ9499@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200617110820.GG8681@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200617113157.GM9499@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200617113157.GM9499@dhcp22.suse.cz> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen , dsterba@suse.cz, David Howells , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes , Waiman Long , Dan Carpenter , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner , Joe Perches , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:31:57PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 17-06-20 04:08:20, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > If you call vfree() under > > a spinlock, you're in trouble. in_atomic() only knows if we hold a > > spinlock for CONFIG_PREEMPT, so it's not safe to check for in_atomic() > > in __vfree(). So we need the warning in order that preempt people can > > tell those without that there is a bug here. > > ... Unless I am missing something in_interrupt depends on preempt_count() as > well so neither of the two is reliable without PREEMPT_COUNT configured. preempt_count() always tracks whether we're in interrupt context, regardless of CONFIG_PREEMPT. The difference is that CONFIG_PREEMPT will track spinlock acquisitions as well.