From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCAAC433E0 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 02:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C70420776 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 02:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="i1DCYPGZ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6C70420776 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49nRVl6ZlhzDqLW for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:59:43 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=sashal@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=i1DCYPGZ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49nPFT5XyRzDqss for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:18:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F30A421D82; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 01:18:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592443083; bh=1tCzH45gXjy+otp1OGNHg/b1uFZzyIeKN56/uw0Cnos=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=i1DCYPGZpbi9hMp24rpcneB3YEbhclXww7xAIEoTLZZJKF6UQuj1l19yz5GSE4e7y 6aqTRGAPVUoikLUybGLcL+i/o/LnA19NmStnI/e2SJ9CdB6bFrkwPWDCU91MMHTEDw +wYYKwY2/VT8DM0RvWmWzNNEJrw+ONum2bTdi0RM= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 068/266] powerpc/crashkernel: Take "mem=" option into account Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 21:13:13 -0400 Message-Id: <20200618011631.604574-68-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20200618011631.604574-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20200618011631.604574-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Sasha Levin , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Hari Bathini , Pingfan Liu Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Pingfan Liu [ Upstream commit be5470e0c285a68dc3afdea965032f5ddc8269d7 ] 'mem=" option is an easy way to put high pressure on memory during some test. Hence after applying the memory limit, instead of total mem, the actual usable memory should be considered when reserving mem for crashkernel. Otherwise the boot up may experience OOM issue. E.g. it would reserve 4G prior to the change and 512M afterward, if passing crashkernel="2G-4G:384M,4G-16G:512M,16G-64G:1G,64G-128G:2G,128G-:4G", and mem=5G on a 256G machine. This issue is powerpc specific because it puts higher priority on fadump and kdump reservation than on "mem=". Referring the following code: if (fadump_reserve_mem() == 0) reserve_crashkernel(); ... /* Ensure that total memory size is page-aligned. */ limit = ALIGN(memory_limit ?: memblock_phys_mem_size(), PAGE_SIZE); memblock_enforce_memory_limit(limit); While on other arches, the effect of "mem=" takes a higher priority and pass through memblock_phys_mem_size() before calling reserve_crashkernel(). Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1585749644-4148-1-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c index c4ed328a7b96..7a1c11a7cba5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c @@ -114,11 +114,12 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *image) void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) { - unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base; + unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base, total_mem_sz; int ret; + total_mem_sz = memory_limit ? memory_limit : memblock_phys_mem_size(); /* use common parsing */ - ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(), + ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, total_mem_sz, &crash_size, &crash_base); if (ret == 0 && crash_size > 0) { crashk_res.start = crash_base; @@ -177,6 +178,7 @@ void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) /* Crash kernel trumps memory limit */ if (memory_limit && memory_limit <= crashk_res.end) { memory_limit = crashk_res.end + 1; + total_mem_sz = memory_limit; printk("Adjusted memory limit for crashkernel, now 0x%llx\n", memory_limit); } @@ -185,7 +187,7 @@ void __init reserve_crashkernel(void) "for crashkernel (System RAM: %ldMB)\n", (unsigned long)(crash_size >> 20), (unsigned long)(crashk_res.start >> 20), - (unsigned long)(memblock_phys_mem_size() >> 20)); + (unsigned long)(total_mem_sz >> 20)); if (!memblock_is_region_memory(crashk_res.start, crash_size) || memblock_reserve(crashk_res.start, crash_size)) { -- 2.25.1