From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com, kernel-team@android.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de, rafael@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
adharmap@codeaurora.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lkp@lists.01.org, mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, tkjos@google.com
Subject: Re: [cpufreq] d83f959b5e: kmsg.cpufreq:cpufreq_online:Failed_to_initialize_policy_for_cpu:#(-#)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:25:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200623092536.GA52234@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200622005457.GI5535@shao2-debian>
Hi,
Thanks for the report.
On Monday 22 Jun 2020 at 08:54:57 (+0800), kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9):
>
> commit: d83f959b5e7a6378a4afbff23de2a2d064d95749 ("[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Specify default governor on command line")
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Quentin-Perret/cpufreq-Specify-the-default-governor-on-command-line/20200616-005920
> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
>
> in testcase: kernel-selftests
> with following parameters:
>
> group: kselftests-x86
> ucode: 0xdc
>
> test-description: The kernel contains a set of "self tests" under the tools/testing/selftests/ directory. These are intended to be small unit tests to exercise individual code paths in the kernel.
> test-url: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kselftest.txt
>
>
> on test machine: 8 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz with 16G memory
>
> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
>
>
>
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
>
>
>
> [ 8.715369] intel_pstate: Intel P-state driver initializing
> [ 8.721146] cpufreq: cpufreq_online: Failed to initialize policy for cpu: 0 (-61)
> [ 8.728900] cpufreq: cpufreq_online: Failed to initialize policy for cpu: 1 (-61)
> [ 8.736615] cpufreq: cpufreq_online: Failed to initialize policy for cpu: 2 (-61)
> [ 8.744400] cpufreq: cpufreq_online: Failed to initialize policy for cpu: 3 (-61)
> [ 8.752222] cpufreq: cpufreq_online: Failed to initialize policy for cpu: 4 (-61)
> [ 8.760010] cpufreq: cpufreq_online: Failed to initialize policy for cpu: 5 (-61)
> [ 8.768077] cpufreq: cpufreq_online: Failed to initialize policy for cpu: 6 (-61)
> [ 8.775891] cpufreq: cpufreq_online: Failed to initialize policy for cpu: 7 (-61)
That, I think, is because of the issue I reported here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200615174141.GA235811@google.com/
The v2 (to be posted shortly) will address this.
Thanks,
Quentin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-15 16:55 [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: Specify the default governor on command line Quentin Perret
2020-06-15 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Register governors at core_initcall Quentin Perret
2020-06-16 4:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 8:31 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-15 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Specify default governor on command line Quentin Perret
2020-06-15 17:41 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-16 4:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 8:31 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-16 9:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 9:48 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-16 9:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 9:56 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-20 14:36 ` [cpufreq] d83f959b5e: aim7.jobs-per-min -30.2% regression kernel test robot
2020-06-22 0:54 ` [cpufreq] d83f959b5e: kmsg.cpufreq:cpufreq_online:Failed_to_initialize_policy_for_cpu:#(-#) kernel test robot
2020-06-23 9:25 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200623092536.GA52234@google.com \
--to=qperret@google.com \
--cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).